Just wanted to add:
From a Criminal standpoint:
From a criminal standpoint, these actions of the A's would fall under the umbrella of the accessory, perjury, obstruction issues , so as to merge in as evidence of those crimes.
Each instance of misleading LE isn't going to be charged as a separate offense, imho.
The State would have to prove the fundamental elements of the crime, over and over and over.
It makes more sense to me to charge it once, and offer the proof of whatever intent is required by the criminal statute being used, just one time, with an eye toward conviction.
This way the evidence of lying, misleading, interfering, is offered as evidence of the particular crime being proved by the prosecution.
If the jury discounts the A's lied on Monday, they still have Tuesday's and Wednesday's lies to consider towards a conviction, if that makes sense.
If they don't think the interference on one date, offered as evidence , is at criminal level, then why not give them more ammo to return a guilty finding.
LAy out repeat instances of interfering.
I'm not talking about any instance of criminal activity here other than the conduct of the Anthony's, for purposes of theorizing how a crime would be charged :wink: It's just an opinion.
A continuing course of conduct is often charged as one crime for these reasons.
:blowkiss:
