Brainy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 672
- Reaction score
- 477
BBM- I thought that, too, that if I didn't do anything I wouldn't be concerned about a conviction, but I was never more wrong.
I'd share my story of being falsely accused of a crime and nearly having my life ruined, and being interrogated by the police for something I didn't do, but I know it won't make a hill of beans. Those of you who have never been in the hot seat personally, will never understand how precious the right to remain silent & protecting yourself from self incrimination is. I'm not even going to waste my time trying to convince you. Suffice to say, should you find yourself a victim of circumstance, you'll learn first hand.
Yeah, we get your point. It really isn't about convincing anyone about anything. In the end, it is a personal choice. I know I would not remain silent if my loved one or a friend was in danger and I did nothing to stand up for them. I could not just go on with my life feeling that I saved my own *advertiser censored* so people would think good of me. Yes, it's true that I have not personally been in such a circumstance and it is easy to just feel that Clint guilty because he looks guilty, however, personally, I do have a difficult time relating of how he could have just plain refused to take the polygraph, because again, I can't understand that he was all concerned about himself, own safety while his friend just vanished. It just makes me sad.
Frankly, I don't think he truly cared about Brian. His behavior of distancing himself from his past only suggests that he never had any intentions of looking for Brian, speaking out or preserving his memory in some way.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk