Tiggerford
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2016
- Messages
- 36
- Reaction score
- 1
ok fine whatever, I am assuming the bar was successful, it was busy
surveillance video obtained from the businesses (plural?)in the area Joey was last seen is very low quality- all businesses in that area have crap&y survellance??
why have them if they are the pitts. I bet your insurance goes down if you have them
These kinda statements are made in a lot of cases like this. They are cheap nowdays.
if there useless what is the point in terms of business owners??
http://www.nbcnews.com/feature/missing-in-america/search-enters-fourth-week-missing-columbus-man-joseph-labute-n546816
RE:So there are "few clues to go on" according to the NBC story, but there also are no billboards, no reward for information offered, no P.I. involved, no further search parties, no FB page, possibly no other surveillance tapes checked...I'm sure I'm leaving out some other "No's" that don't come to mind right now...LE is either throwing up one hell of a smokescreen or things just aren't making sense at all
I dont know in drugs or gangs or murders maybe I understand all this cop silence. It has been like that in a lot of these. If your looking for something, your keys, it helps to mention it to someone.
I do not understand in missing persons , when one is looking for something not letting the most amount of peopple you can know what you know . It seems counter productive, in missing persons cases IMO
As far as surveillance cameras go, I've been trying to figure the same thing out. I've see home security cameras which give a clear picture- even in pitch black....and they aren't too costly. I don't understand why a business which has potential to be robbed or involved in some type of a crime, wouldn't invest in decent cameras!