arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
James hasn't tweeted for 16 minutes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Prosecution pointing out inconsistencies in GW4's testimony and asking "Why that lie?". Agree AC doing great job connecting the dots.
I think Angela repeating "All he does is lie" is hitting home to the jury.All the times people asked "why is she describing this or that evidence?" It's now all explained how it fits into evidence of complicity, of lies told, etc.
Defense will try to show in their closing statement that JW and AW lied about GW4's involvement. Expect lots of comments during defense closing.Defense hasn't been able to prove that anything Jake or Angela has said is a lie.
Never heard what GW4 thought when Jake confessed.
He never said anything from the stand about being upset about Jake or his mom telling lies about him.
Has she finished with evidence and moving on to the charges, or is she coming back to the evidence?
Hers is a style different from any other prosecutor I've watched during 30 years of sitting through trials in person, then following trials on TV and live stream.Personally I found the constant “uhmmmms” and “we will talk about that later” combined with long pauses of her looking for information make it harder to hit the point home.
By the time she interjects herself and gets back to the “original” topic she was talking about, it just makes it harder for IMOO me to connect the pieces together. Hopefully the jurors don’t need have any of that JMHO.
Same.Maybe it's my own deficiency, but I process the info better when it's concise. When the words come a few at a time, long pauses, ummm, etc., I have to start replaying and reconstructing the sentence in my mind so I can understand it. I get lots of practice with that watching my local newscasters attempting to read.
I still think she's getting it said, and done.
I feel like Wilson's style of presentation may have been able to shorten deliberations.
IMO, also makes her seem not confident. This is just me as we all process information differently.Personally I found the constant “uhmmmms” and “we will talk about that later” combined with long pauses of her looking for information make it harder to hit the point home.
By the time she interjects herself and gets back to the “original” topic she was talking about, it just makes it harder for IMOO me to connect the pieces together. Hopefully the jurors don’t need have any of that JMHO.
I think she will come back after defense closing and fine tune it, she will have the last word. IYO what is missing??Has she finished with evidence and moving on to the charges, or is she coming back to the evidence?