kgeaux
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Messages
- 7,598
- Reaction score
- 30
Well... they haven't denied that at all. They've talked about all the people who've come together for this case, including the FBI CARD team. They're saying they aren't calling it a criminal investigation yet; I take that to mean they're working both simultaneously.
With a member of the child's family being a police detective, I can imagine that he would press for "all resources" to be utilized in the investigation. If they aren't calling it a criminal investigation, that means they're still investigating all possibilities, they haven't narrowed down exactly what kind of case this is. But, while they haven't narrowed the investigation down to any one type of situation, they ARE making use of every tool and agency at their disposal.
I'm not sleuthing them myself, so I don't wanna get slapped with another time out, but honestly I'm kinda baffled by the whole No Sleuthing Family members rule. The amount of people who'd literally get away with murder if LE worked by that rule would be astonishing. Sucks though it does, a lot of the time family members are responsible.
Not at all saying they are here, and I understand respect for the victims etc. But, in this day and age, it's so hard to know who the real victims are (apart from the children themselves). imo.
It is so simple in my mind. Until LE names any member of the family as a suspect or POI, they are considered VICTIMS. And we don't post negative things, or things that should be kept private, about innocent family individuals.
Question here. Has anyone ever heard of any previous missing children's cases where a LE officer was assigned to the home of the missing parents? I'm new to WS in that I have only followed a few cases here, Tori Stafford and currently Susan Powell, though I have glanced a bit at a few others, but not intensely. Even in thinking of other local cases throughout the years where I have lived, I don't recall ever hearing of such a thing. I am curious if this is something new for missing children's cases (if so, but only in Kyron's home town or state),? DOes it vary by state? jurisdiction? Anyone know?
p.s. I am NOT making any accusations towards the stepmom - I want to make that clear. Like everyone else, I am completely stumped on this one.
This child's step-father is a detective. I am not sure if this is the usual approach, but it wouldn't surprise me one little bit for a detective's family to get "special" treatment when his child goes missing.
we have 2 contradictory statements about Kyron.
1. A child who says that the sub asked the regular teacher where Kyron was. The teacher answered that he was getting a drink of water or whatever.
2. A comment in a news article that said SM had an appt (with Kyron?)
Both cannot be true. Is either true?
Being a former teacher, it is so hard to fathom that a teacher wouldn't check up on the whereabouts of a child, especially on a day as crazy as that one must have been.
Not casting blame on anyone. Just flummoxed.
I just clicked on the link to the video where the student says the substitute and teacher had the conversation you mention. On the same page as the video is a quote from a police official saying that the child was mistaken, because there was NO substitute in the classroom that day. The police official believed the child who made the statement had his days mixed up.
EXCELLENT POINT Forensic Fan! If Kyron was expected to be on the bus that afternoon, why hadn't there been arrangments made to pick him up to transport that project that was too big to put on the bus in the first place?
We do not know that no arrangements were made.
And as for the rumored "appointment"- perhaps it was the teacher who had an appointment: there was a substitute there that day; maybe she was going to fill in when the regular teacher left to go to her appointment.
(Note to Self: Never use the word appointment three times in one sentence.)
LOL about multiple uses of a word: I've found myself in that box before! I'm going to have to go look for that video and see if I can re-link so everybody can read what I read! Because if the substitute is a rumor, we don't need to keep agonizing over it!!