cluciano63
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 41,198
- Reaction score
- 27,296
I believe there was criticism following the Kim case and how it was handled? Maybe that is why they are so reluctant to speak about the search, etc...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey ASAP please I need video footage and also photo comparison of the VW stuff. I am chatting with a friend who may be doing SAR this weekend and she has not even heard about this and really would like to.
Thank you
It's true: if LE thought Kyron just wandered off, there would be no need for secrecy, caginess, and being vague about the last times he was seen. There would be no need to control the story so tightly if he was just lost.
LE must think there's a very good chance there IS a perpetrator. BUT, they also don't think he's far from the school. They're searching in a very tight radius.
What this points to, to me, is that 1)A perpetrator took him, and 2) they left on foot.
What if the last time Kyron was seen, he was WITH someone? That would account for why they're so reluctant to to confirm about when he was last seen -- they don't want that "last seen" story getting out and revealing who he was with.
I'm not the first person to raise this possibility, but to me it looks an awful lot like an Elizabeth Olten situation: a young perpetrator, someone he knew and trusted, who took him into the woods near the school. And they can't "scare" this young person, because they need info out of him or her.
It's true: if LE thought Kyron just wandered off, there would be no need for secrecy, caginess, and being vague about the last times he was seen. There would be no need to control the story so tightly if he was just lost.
LE must think there's a very good chance there IS a perpetrator. BUT, they also don't think he's far from the school. They're searching in a very tight radius.
What this points to, to me, is that 1)A perpetrator took him, and 2) they left on foot.
What if the last time Kyron was seen, he was WITH someone? That would account for why they're so reluctant to to confirm about when he was last seen -- they don't want that "last seen" story getting out and revealing who he was with.
I'm not the first person to raise this possibility, but to me it looks an awful lot like an Elizabeth Olten situation: a young perpetrator, someone he knew and trusted, who took him into the woods near the school. And they can't "scare" this young person, because they need info out of him or her.
Oh YES LOL Coyotes. Ta Elk are fascinating. Once while out in the Oregon woods I came across these perfectly shaped oval things, lots of them, and thought they could have come from s flying saucer they were so unique. Elk poop! I never laughed so hard in my life. LOL
checking high lines?Do you know where?That's what I was thinking when he said electric.
Hey ASAP please I need video footage and also photo comparison of the VW stuff. I am chatting with a friend who may be doing SAR this weekend and she has not even heard about this and really would like to.
Thank you
It's true: if LE thought Kyron just wandered off, there would be no need for secrecy, caginess, and being vague about the last times he was seen. There would be no need to control the story so tightly if he was just lost.
LE must think there's a very good chance there IS a perpetrator. BUT, they also don't think he's far from the school. They're searching in a very tight radius.
As I remember that is because Mr Kim had not been dead very long when he was located. And he was not really that far away from his car - down the side of the ravine and down the river a bit, found on the rocks. The search was too little too late and not well organized at the beginning. IMOI believe there was criticism following the Kim case and how it was handled? Maybe that is why they are so reluctant to speak about the search, etc...
checking high lines?Do you know where?That's what I was thinking when he said electric.
As I remember that is because Mr Kim had not been dead very long when he was located. And he was not really that far away from his car - down the side of the ravine and down the river a bit, found on the rocks. The search was too little too late and not well organized at the beginning. IMO
Bouncing off of KScarpetta's theory of an undergroung hidey-hole....sure would be more comfy with a little bit of electricity down there for the coffeemaker! It would be great if they ended up catching the kidnapper because he didn't want to risk heating his morning coffee over a campfire...smoke signals, you know.
I know that an underground bunker does sound flaky, but it has been done before, and it sounds like the rough terrain around there might lend itself to the concealment of a man-made cave.
The little boy in this VW looks just like kyron to me. Could this woman driving possibly be the teacher that left?
When LE says something is "an isolated incident" it means they know who is responsible (or have a very good feel for who). I agree with the posters above who say if the little boy is merely missing because he wandered away and got lost, then why all the secrecy? No, there's something amiss. It leads me to strongly believe this is a crime, it is an abduction, and LE believes they know who it is (enough to say this is an 'isolated incident').