CharlestonGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 5,857
- Reaction score
- 47,452
In the Olten case, the reporters were asked to not report (can't remember why). The reporters respected that.
It could be that whatever they report would hurt him, and reporters would agree and would not want to do that no matter what.
It could be they know who it is and want the person to give up info, like with the Olten case. They might not want to scare the person off.
Hence, not saying it's criminal. Don't worry, it's not that big of a deal. You can tell us because it's not criminal.
So, either it's a minor who did this that would believe that, or some really disturbed person who would buy that.
That's true to a point. The reporters did not report who the perp was because she was 15, but they reported the story. When and where and by whom the victim was last seen, where and with whom she'd spent the evening, what time she left the neighbors house. The police did reserve comment about the identity of the juvenile perpetrator, but they did not say "no comment" to every - or any really - questions the reporters asked about those hours before Elizabeth went missing.