One thing that you keep bringing up is that Gricar may have wanted to set up his daughter with his pension, that he was worth more to her dead. That is not evidence yet you use it in your arguments and post as such.
Being tired and napping is not evidence of walkaway yet you use it as such.
Not prosecuting Sandusky is not evidence of walkaway yet you use it as such.
There is no evidence of walkaway, only opinion.
On the first part, his will get more money, that could be evidence of something voluntary. It would point to a motivation for walking away or committing suicide. Simply put, because RFG is not there, his heirs get more. We can also add that he did not have a huge amount of assets.
Actually, it has been suggested that not wanting to face the fallout from the 1998 decision could be a motive, but it was not suggested by me. I think it could be broader, not wanting to be the "ex-DA." In all fairness, Sara Ganim would have been banging on his front door in mid to late 2011, with the rest of the media showing up in November. We have seen something similar in the Chris Lee case, but on a smaller scale.
As for "napping" is is much broader, with a wide range of sources saying that RFG was acting uncharacteristically. "Distraught" was one term used. Again, that points to voluntary. It could be argued that RFG was worried about his
physical safety. However, venturing into areas with spotty or nonexistent cell phone communication, that are not regularly patrolled by the police, and that are sparsely populated is
not indicative of that. Especially when he did that on 4/14.
Now, these three pieces of information point to voluntary action, though not necessarily walkaway.
We can can also add his desire to eliminate the data on the laptop.