I would like to know, with respect to the polys is if she was deceptive when answering questions specifically about Kyron, and her involvement in his abduction or if she was deceptive about other things (her whereabouts for example).
I would think that is a natural reaction for anyone on the last person that was with the child or supposed to be the one caring for them at that moment.
I would think that is a natural reaction for anyone on the last person that was with the child or supposed to be the one caring for them at that moment.
This, for me, is the most damning piece of evidence against TH. Unless Kyron was not like most other kids his age, he probably told his mother everything about his relationship with TH. She KNOWS that everything wasn't all rainbows and lollipops in that household. When my children were young I heard every miserable detail about their father and stepmother. There are stepmothers who can be unbelievably cruel and manage to hide it from their spouse. DY has my utmost sympathies and I pray daily for her strength and courage.
This, for me, is the most damning piece of evidence against TH. Unless Kyron was not like most other kids his age, he probably told his mother everything about his relationship with TH. She KNOWS that everything wasn't all rainbows and lollipops in that household. When my children were young I heard every miserable detail about their father and stepmother. There are stepmothers who can be unbelievably cruel and manage to hide it from their spouse. DY has my utmost sympathies and I pray daily for her strength and courage.
I agree! I know that I have been guilty, in the past, of saying to my 3yo, when my 19mo starts crying, "what did you do to him?", and I did not see the cause for his starting to cry. I believe her reaction is fairly normal and along the lines of this.
As a mother of five, I agree completely with this assessment and analogy. However, it is normally instinctual to ask 'what did you do to him?' because the older child has in fact hurt the smaller child before (whether or not it was intentional).
I just don't buy that Desiree would automatically assume SM did something to Kyron unless she had good reason to suspect her. There was obviously animosity between the two or Desiree wouldn't have immediately suspected SM. JMHO.
Now, why Desiree hadn't sought custody of Kyron if she did, in fact, have reason to believe SM wasn't being good to him...that is a huge question. Although, perhaps she did, and we just aren't privvy to that information yet.
It is quite possible that DY did try to regain custody and we just don't know it yet, or possibly not. With my stepdaughter, we sincerely felt that we would be able to provide better for her, but did not seek to gain custody for a variety of reasons, including not wanting to take her away from her half-brother, who we would not have been able to gain custody of. While we have terrible issues with my husband's ex, with her manipulating, controlling & lying behavior, we felt it was in my DSD's best interest to remain with her mother.
Similarly, DY may have disliked TMH and felt that she was off and not right, but may not have felt that there was enough reason to make it in Kyron's best interest to live with her again. Maybe she felt that Kyron, being a shy timid boy, would be better off living with his father and older step-brother, who could give him a regular strong male presence in his life. Maybe she even asked Kyron what he wanted to do. Maybe he said that he wanted to keep living with his dad and continue going to his school. Maybe that was enough for her to not move forward. Maybe there were other reasons.
We just don't know at this point, but I do not hold Kyron living with KH, even though DY thought things were off and that TMH was a liar, over DY's head, as to why it appears that she had not sought to regain custody of Kyron. Generally, when parents are separated, the child has to live with one of them. Why does it make it any more of an issue, if that child happens to live with his father, instead of his mother?
Thank you. It's not just as easy as taking the kid away his father and that's that. There's legal not mention emotional issues that can be hard to work out. Plus, it could be that DY stepping in and doing that could alienate her from her son. I have a friend who's kids had issues with their stepmother for years, but if she had tried to stand up and do something about it, both kids proabably would have been mad at her for upsetting the family. That and they both complained about their stepmother, but if she said something to their father, they'd get mad at her for talking about it. She chose to try and preserve harmony in her own home and let her girls deal with what was going on in their dad's home. I don't think she ever thought they were in any real danger from the stepmother, either. And eventually, one of them stopped visiting her dad much at all. Ironically, he divorced the stepmother not that long ago.
They are much older than Kyron, but I can see DY not wanting this to turn into bad feelings and a Jerry Springer like atmosphere even if she was right. She probably didn't believe TH would actually harm Kyron. It was better to not rock the boat of two houses, which would harm Kyron emotionally in the process, than to try and take him out of his father's home for good. Plus, Kyron would probably have the law on his side, and all DY would have is TH is a liar. Unless she had definitive proof that Kyron was being abused by TH in that home, it wasn't likely that she could just take Kyrona nd be done with KH and TH. Plus, I'm sure KH would fight like hell for Kyron anyway.
Could also be that mom knew stepmom wanted custody of Kyron, and rather than thinking she harmed him, she immediately thought TH had spirited him away.
Young also said she suspects that Terri Horman did not act alone.
CNN: "Do you think she would have done this alone?"
Desiree Young: "I don't believe so because honestly she didn't take out a contract on her husband alone, so I think she probably needed help. But that's speculation. It's not proven and I don't have any evidence to say that's the case, but I think it helps me feel better about the situation if that's the case.
http://www.kptv.com/news/24197226/detail.html
Is she saying there was someone else besides TH and the landscaper involved with the MFH?????????????