Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just wanted to jump in and say that IMO, this whole thing was set up today. Including the interview with DB afterwards. (I'll have more on that after I listen to the interview again but I think he was given talking points and screwed up timelines and facts - he was VERY nervous with dry mouth).
I want to know who set up this interview with DB and when. Anyone know?
Did other reporters request interviews with DB?
Not promising this is a correct answer, but I think the general census that jodi is not letting them, and it would jeopardize her earlier statements that she was tortured with wooden spoons. Then it also ruins the dt mitigating factor appearance of "family support".
Also, Juan is a mean man that would tear her mom apart just by looking at her.
In all honesty I will say it again. I believe her mom could plea for Jodi's life without opening the door for redirect on her interview with detective Flores. I don't know why they are being belligerent.
Did he cop to the penis pics they keep attributing to travis?
No he did not. I don't think he would of either.
I found that odd too and completely agree. Hmmm, I didn't see Travis or any of his Mormon PPL pals kill, scam, lie, etc. I also don't see how he could not have noticed anything wrong with her when her family friends certainly did (per Mom in police interview). For some reason, he feels obligated to help her.
It was a creepy interview.
Just wanted to jump in and say that IMO, this whole thing was set up today. Including the interview with DB afterwards. (I'll have more on that after I listen to the interview again but I think he was given talking points and screwed up timelines and facts - he was VERY nervous with dry mouth).
I want to know who set up this interview with DB and when. Anyone know?
Did other reporters request interviews with DB?
Watching katie. Wick on dr drew! She said a couple of the jurors looked pissed and disgusted.
This is an editorial.Mormons can have a belief in "magical thinking" If DB googled that term, he might have found this article from the Deseret News. Who knows?
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700189566/Magical-thinking-is-not-the-plan.html
Ok I think I've gotten today figured out now.
I think they NEVER intended, after last week, to put on any mitigation witnesses. I think they knew the risk that would occur during cross would be more devastating than these "nobodys" in terms of Arias could do to help her (esp w/ her own family sitting in there oddly mute in front of the jury).
I believe they knew there was no way they'd get a mistrial out of this.
I believe they in some kind of desperate last min move, decided to throw themselves under the bus to set up an ineffective counsel appeal (that won't work). From what I've seen, it doesn't appear Willmott was thrilled about this last strategy which could have been cooked up by Jodi herself!
I do not think that Daryl Brewer belived he'd be testifying torday. I don't think the interview done with him was any accident. I think that was also totally cued up and ready to fire. That was Michael Kiefer speaking to him in the background who got his pal Lin Sue Cooney to do the front of camera stuff. This was not done for HER news station but HIS (AZ CEntral, an extension of the NEWSPAPER). Kiefer's trying to distance himself but I believe, based on all I know, that he was hipped up to this before court today and ready to go with his "interview" of Darryl Brewer.
I think this was all carefully choreographed. I think the defense decided to launch Brewer's "testimony" via Kiefer hoping the jurors might see it without him having to be cross examined.
I do think it was that well thought out/planned.
Including Nurmi's faux outrage and temper tantrum.
BBM~ ITA. It seemed so scripted his little temper tantrum.
What are your thoughts on the sealed hearings?
So they can be cross examined? I didn't realize that.
Yes, I don't remember the terms. But it's to ensure that the statements are not conflicting to previous statements by the defendant, or "tv interviews" by the witnesses and they also need to be deemed credible sources.
Which?
I didn't think they would be cross-examined because Travis' family wasn't. But I guess that's different somehow?