Ok - silly me to quote on an article before I read it. Did ya'll see this:
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15699795...old-of-theft-complaint-involving-babys-father
Jeremy Irwin called police about 4 a.m. Oct. 4 to report that daughter Lisa was missing from her crib. KCTV5 obtained on Friday the radio transmissions between dispatchers and police officers.
One of the responding officers is told about an Aug. 16 call involving Irwin.
"There was a complaint issued to a Jeremy Irwin regards to a larceny," the dispatcher tells the officer. "You can log it onto your call and also could you call me for additional information in regards to that call."
KCTV5 was unable to obtain more information about this complaint on Friday. Irwin has not spoken to local reporters about the search for his missing daughter since last week
At first I thought about the car break in BUT
A complaint issued TO A Jeremy Irwin in regards to a larceny.
If Ji reported the car break in - wouldn't he have been the complaintant? Wouldn't the complaint have been issued TO whoever the perp is?
What am I missing here?