Why was it called in as a burglary in process and not as an abduction?
To keep the media away....
They dont release them in that state. moo
Six statesAlabama, Mississippi, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Wyomingkeep 911 call recordings confidential. Georgia, Maine, Minnesota and South Dakota place some restrictions on the release of 911 calls or the information contained in them. Excerpts from and links to state laws follow.
In what way? If anything was stolen, ot was a larceny. And no, the wording used is dispatch/lle jargon for them responding to his complaint of a theft.
Why was it called in as a burglary in process and not as an abduction?
Did he call it in as a burglary in progress? I listened to the tape several times, and as far as I can tell, and since we don't have the 911 call, he might not have hiven a nature of the complaint. He might not have told the dispatcher whether he was inside or outside, he might not have told her whether he searched the whole house, he might not even have been coherent enough for her to understand what he was reporting.
She also might have tagged it as an in progress call in order to warn the officers to take extra caution. It could be a huge deal, but then again, it could be nothing more than a miscommunication.
The media listens to police scanners, the LE may not have wanted to alert the media that there was an abduction, so it was classified as a burglary in progress. JMO
The media listens to police scanners, the LE may not have wanted to alert the media that there was an abduction, so it was classified as a burglary in progress. JMO
I would like to validate something but it's difficult to at this time.
The news articles pointed out here mention there is a larceny complaint against JI, but I've not heard it on the dispatch tapes, only in text by the media. If someone has that specific audio, I would like to review it.
Here is what I can tell you from decades of monitoring police activity in the greater Kansas City metro area, and the same techniques are used across the country.
When an officer is dispatched to a call, the dispatcher will give the officer a brief summary of past situations at the address.
Example call I just heard on the scanner:
If anyone has a link to further audio where KCPD dispatcher is giving detailing a larceny please PM me.
What if this whole thing was over a cell phone? That would be so messed up. I mean, why would they be missing, why would someone want them or want to dispose of them?
I would like to validate something but it's difficult to at this time.
The news articles pointed out here mention there is a larceny complaint against JI, but I've not heard it on the dispatch tapes, only in text by the media. If someone has that specific audio, I would like to review it.
Here is what I can tell you from decades of monitoring police activity in the greater Kansas City metro area, and the same techniques are used across the country.
When an officer is dispatched to a call, the dispatcher will give the officer a brief summary of past situations at the address.
An example call you can see on another thread of mine:
Police Dispatch Tapes - Page 4 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
If anyone has a link to further audio where KCPD dispatcher is giving detailing a larceny please PM me. I don't think it exists though.
Most LE now (and especially in metro areas) have a laptop hooked up to their car and mounted on a stand in the front seat. Wouldn't any responding officer be able to check certain info that way and rather quickly too?
How do you know the media isn't just reporting the facts as stated by the dispatcher and the dispatcher is the one making the verbal errors (assuming it IS an error)?