You're wrong. The testimony from the stand was evidence. Legal evidence.
You're free to attribute whatever weight you deem fair, as was the jury. But it was indeed evidence. Make no mistake about it.
What is this you have some special ability to see racism and sexism that Jodi was a victim of that no one else sees??? Color me confused.
I'm also a tad amazed, but not surprised, you feel qualified to speak for the rest of the world.
Don't be amazed, I can read what international news and many many other outlets are saying. It's not terribly hard, so you can do it too it might help with the confusion! I have no such confusion.
I don't think I do speak for the rest of the world, imo my postings are intelligently built and based on my own experience, and I quite frequently say imo. imo I have absolutely no idea why on earth you should find it so surprising at all. Unless you make assumptions. It's terrible that you might feel so confused by it all.
I have no special abilities beyond deep thinking and high intuition and a sound ability in lateral thinking. With respect, there was no legal evidence presented that she slashed tyres stalked or stole a gun. It was heavily suggested, but not legally established. She had brown hair according to Police reports presented when the gun was stolen. What a prosecutor suggests in argument was not establish legal evidence. It is all conjecture.
The forensics alone are very open to question. It was nowhere near a thorough job.
There are some things that are just impossible to say on this website, as we are all aware, otherwise I would go much much further in my analysis and in my explanations, and include micro and meta theory, of meta-modernism in action. But then I would need to introduce Platonic dialectical theory and metaxy, which is beyond the scope of 'armchair psychology', and a difficult concept for people to grasp as it is a very new paradigm emerging from post-modernism. It is quite worthy of publication to explain the social forces from this perspective time and context, this case exemplifies meta modernism and it's applications extraordinarily well.
So I read elsewhere to provide me with balanced evidence of this phenomena occurring and I have found it on many international and local websites about the laws, the evidence etc. Plenty of scholars have weighed from a legal perspective. I have looked at from many different perspectives beyond the DSM, and my outcomes are entirely different with no measuring at all. imo
A measuring handbook is a guideline not a definitive authority.
If we rely on that alone then we must be self-reflexive enough to recognise and acknowledge it's inherent bias towards gender and power and cultural appropriateness. Does it apply universally to all cultures? No it certainly doesn't. Even the people responsible for creating the DSM have alluded to these flaws. It's not just me.
I cannot see that a culturally biased DSM applying to Amazonian tribes, so it is a shorthand tool and nothing more - without a relevant cultural context. Do native tribes in Tibet have 4:100 ASPD's amongst them?
Are they self medicating outcasts?
Do they currently have more than 40 serial killers floating round their community?
Why go beyond the inexperienced state witnesses diagnosis of BPD what
does it serve and mote importantly who does it serve?
As it is, I can only speak to the neo-conservative paradigm of racism and sexism existing in Arizona. Those are statistical facts well known in the US and internationally. I don't criticise US statistics I agree with them. imo The death penalty rate in Arizona is outstanding compared with other states, so is the over-representation of minority groups. Your country agrees with me according to their own statistics.
So if you are confused by US statistics, or 'evidence' not establish as'fact' then don't take it up with me, I had nothing to do with them. imo
