I think he will approach her using different styles.
In my opinion, I don't think he will worry about being too aggressive.
When she tries to expound on her testimony, if necessary, he will firmly remind her to answer yes or no when applicable.
I think most of JA's testimony will be condensed to the pertinent areas deemed by him to get a conviction. In other words, I don't think he will go on and on concerning any one subject. It's the totality of the real evidence, possible impeachments minus the BS.
Also, I think there will be a lot of objections from the defense - hope the judge will let the prosecution proceed w/o too many objections being "sustained" to benefit the defense.
Can't wait to see him in action with her - guess the question now is when will this happen.
Just a guess on my part....
In my opinion, I don't think he will worry about being too aggressive.
When she tries to expound on her testimony, if necessary, he will firmly remind her to answer yes or no when applicable.
I think most of JA's testimony will be condensed to the pertinent areas deemed by him to get a conviction. In other words, I don't think he will go on and on concerning any one subject. It's the totality of the real evidence, possible impeachments minus the BS.
Also, I think there will be a lot of objections from the defense - hope the judge will let the prosecution proceed w/o too many objections being "sustained" to benefit the defense.
Can't wait to see him in action with her - guess the question now is when will this happen.
Just a guess on my part....