~n/t~, I'm not sure what WS's position is, but my issue with that site is that it isn't original reporting - they scrape the web and recycle stories and don't always get things right. I have to wonder why an international business news site would pick up this story in the first place - it's not business-related whatsoever. Like DeAnn mentioned in a post yesterday(?), it seems they are going for keyword hits by aggregating from other sites.
Here's a complaint to Google, wanting ibtimes listings removed because the complainant alleges they are lifting content:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/news/thread?tid=7cc26183f9902195&hl=en (It's probably legal, kind of like examiner.com articles, but maybe not so ethical.)
So far as I can tell, that one article was just a mashup of other organizations' news articles and was made to appear current when some of the info was weeks old. I think if we can trace something in one of their articles to its original source, the link to the original source would probably be okay to post?