Jayelles
New Member
Pro-Ramsey posters ofen ask "Show us where the ramseys lied". It's an oft repeated question. The fact is, there are numerous inconsistancies/conflicting stories which may or may not be actual lies.
Some of these can be explained away by poor memory and the passage of time. However, something has come to my attention which is clearly a lie - by Patsy this time. It cannot be explained away by poor memory or passage of time.
The 1998 interviews took place over 3 days - 23/24/25th June. On each of the second and third days, John and Patsy were both asked if they had discussed the previous days interviews with the other.
24th June (Day 2)
Patsy was asked if she had discussed the previous day's interview with John. She replied:-
However, according to John, he and Patsy DID discuss the previous days interviews. He claims that they discussed:-
1) A line of questioning which had gone on about all the preparations for their trip on the Big Red Boat and how busy Patsy had been.
2) The discussion about the blonde b*tch and how that came about with Priscilla and her untidy house. On 24th, John was able to repeat VERBATIM, Patsy's account of this tale (that she had made on 23rd and that they'd discussed on evening of 23rd). An insignificant little female-gossip story that most men wouldn't even listen to - let alone be able to repeat word for word at a later date.
3) The pineapple in the bowl in the kitchen.
Yet Patsy said they had no discussion - just enquired after each other's wellbeing.
25th June (Day 3)
Again both parties were asked if they had discussed the previous day's interviews, THIS time, JOhn said yes and Patsy said yes - but only within a group of people and that she didn't think they had shared much:-
John admitted they'd discussed the barbie nightgown.
So on the second day, Patsy DENIED discussing the interviews with John whereas John admitted they had discussed numerous aspects of the interviews. Clearly Patsy lied and it cannot be attributed to poor memory or the passage of time. By the third day, she too admitted that they'd discussed the interviews.
It's interesting that the interrogators asked then this question each day. I think that was a planned part of the interview and was put in there to see how truthful they would be about something which took place only hours previously - and Patsy lied.
Tom Haney made a comment about it:-
Some of these can be explained away by poor memory and the passage of time. However, something has come to my attention which is clearly a lie - by Patsy this time. It cannot be explained away by poor memory or passage of time.
The 1998 interviews took place over 3 days - 23/24/25th June. On each of the second and third days, John and Patsy were both asked if they had discussed the previous days interviews with the other.
24th June (Day 2)
Patsy was asked if she had discussed the previous day's interview with John. She replied:-
13 THOMAS HANEY: What was the
14 conversation with this guy? How about did you
15 and John discuss what happened yesterday?
16 PATSY RAMSEY: No.
17 THOMAS HANEY: You didn't --
18 PATSY RAMSEY: I said how was your
19 day, fine. How was your day, fine.
20 THOMAS HANEY: You didn't discuss,
21 they didn't ask this, they didn't ask that?
22 PATSY RAMSEY: I was very tired, we
23 both were. I was kind of tired -- I was more
24 tired than I thought I was. I think
25 (INAUDIBLE).
However, according to John, he and Patsy DID discuss the previous days interviews. He claims that they discussed:-
1) A line of questioning which had gone on about all the preparations for their trip on the Big Red Boat and how busy Patsy had been.
2) The discussion about the blonde b*tch and how that came about with Priscilla and her untidy house. On 24th, John was able to repeat VERBATIM, Patsy's account of this tale (that she had made on 23rd and that they'd discussed on evening of 23rd). An insignificant little female-gossip story that most men wouldn't even listen to - let alone be able to repeat word for word at a later date.
3) The pineapple in the bowl in the kitchen.
Yet Patsy said they had no discussion - just enquired after each other's wellbeing.
25th June (Day 3)
Again both parties were asked if they had discussed the previous day's interviews, THIS time, JOhn said yes and Patsy said yes - but only within a group of people and that she didn't think they had shared much:-
19 TOM HANEY: Did you talk to John last night
20 about what transpired yesterday?
21 PATSY RAMSEY: I mean, just within the
22 context of the kind of little chat we all had together,
23 but --
24 TOM HANEY: So it is a group thing?
25 PATSY RAMSEY: Yeah. We were both pretty
0431
1 tired when we got back, so we just -- I don't think we
2 shared much.
John admitted they'd discussed the barbie nightgown.
So on the second day, Patsy DENIED discussing the interviews with John whereas John admitted they had discussed numerous aspects of the interviews. Clearly Patsy lied and it cannot be attributed to poor memory or the passage of time. By the third day, she too admitted that they'd discussed the interviews.
It's interesting that the interrogators asked then this question each day. I think that was a planned part of the interview and was put in there to see how truthful they would be about something which took place only hours previously - and Patsy lied.
Tom Haney made a comment about it:-
14 TOM HANEY: It does seem odd though
15 that in talking with you, that you and John
16 haven't spent an awful lot of time discussing
17 what had happened, like last night you said
18 that, you know, you were tired and so you talked
19 about--
20 PATSY RAMSEY: You know like this
21 morning you say did you talk about this with
22 John and, you know, I figured you didn't like us
23 to do that too much.
24 TOM HANEY: But you had 18 months
25 to do that?
0619
1 PATSY RAMSEY: You're right.