sansoucie said:
What did they say he was doing up? And why didn't he notice his sister being taken by whomever since that was the story?
Forgive my ignorance. I read a book or 2 on this case when it first happened and have not kept up on it. I have not been posting on this thread as I have been reading and trying to get a grasp on the current position of the case.
It's not unheard of for a child to commit horrid acts on smaller kids. If he hasn't been ruled out, and obviously he hasn't, I think he is a viable suspect. Could be that there are more ramseys involved than just one.....
We do not know that he was up,we do know that the leaks provided by law enforcement were intended to put the Ramseys in the ugliest light possible.
Was it an effort to get a confession? Possibly! However innocent people do not confess.
The enhanced 911 call,has never been proven to be anything other than the imaginative guesses of that same law enforcement . We know it was sent to aerospace,but........aerospace did not interpret that enhancement. This is an issue that is grossly misunderstood. They enhanced the sound and gave it to law enforcement to "hear",and LE took those rythmic sounds to make up a dialogue between the Ramseys.
Was Burke awake? He heard noises as people were filling the house,not fully awake,he did not get up,not until someone came into his room to ready him for leaving.
There is nothing about this crime that indicates any Ramsey,IMO,killed their daughter,there is much evidence to indicate she was killed by an intruder.
The evidence includes,keys out,a butler kitchen door ajar,windows unlocked in the basement,a suitcase placed to hoist one up and out,fibers that match nothing in the home,fur that can not be sourced in Jonbenet's hands,beaver fur that belongs to NOT one item in that house (patsy did not own beaver fur boots),palm prints (yes two were sourced,one wasn't),shoe prints,(both sas and hi-tec),a baseball bat with fibers found in the yard,a hair found on the blanket,rope in a bedroom,DNA in her panties and under her fingernails that can not be sourced to a Ramsey,a missing source of red marker for a heart drawn on her hand, missing part of the paint brush,tape and cord not found in the home,and there is more,more that amazingly has not been leaked to the public because of it's exculpatory value ,evidence that would change public opinion and further implicate an intruder.
Then there are lies,no footprints in the snow,a copy of "mindhunter" in the bedroom,Patsy's handwriting matches the note,Patsy owned beaver boots,Burke was awakeandthe call had his voice on it,Burke owned hi-tecs,Jonbenet was molested prior to the night of her murder,each and every one of these items,along with others of the same trend, were told to us by Steve Thomas ,too bad Steve Thomas could not repeat ONE OF THESE things in his deposition,WHY? BECAUSE he was under oath. But we are to believe it was a game he was playing,the hero was playing a game? NO,he was pushed to tell the truth,and even his ego couldn't win over that oath!
IMO