Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My summary and opinion so far...
Webb was better than yesterday in his presentation. For me, he has an irritating delivery style and voice, but he was definitely less flustered and much more systematic.
Yesterday the mannequin was stuck in my head and the table evidence, and I was waiting anxiously for rebuttal, but it never came. This was important for me and the fact it wasnt covered spoke volumes.
I felt there was a very condescending, dismissive tone running through the whole statement, IMO it was not helpful to AS. Particularly the attack on Mary almost immediately followed by the request to jury consider AS pain and suffering. Attack Greer ok, hes presenting the case ..but attack Mary?
I also noticed a distinctive drop in tone of voice and level and pitch of volume when discussing RZ apparent reason for suicide. It was not natural IMO, as as soon as the next topic came up he did not dwell a pause before returning to the voluminous levels prior.
It’s insulting to the jurors’s intelligence.
Absolutely Verboten. You've hit the nail on the head.Any call to the "pain and suffering" of Adam, much less one juxtaposed with a callous disregard (distain?) for Mary, is not a particularly good line for the defense. There is waaaaaayyyyy too much deep pain and suffering in what has happened here. But Webb wants our deep sympathy for the guy who last saw victim alive, first found her dead, and LIED about it, because people think he might have something to do with it? I'm guessing there will be few tears for Adam in this regard.
My summary and opinion so far...
Webb was better than yesterday in his presentation. For me, he has an irritating delivery style and voice, but he was definitely less flustered and much more systematic.
Yesterday the mannequin was stuck in my head and the table evidence, and I was waiting anxiously for rebuttal, but it never came. This was important for me and the fact it wasnt covered spoke volumes.
I felt there was a very condescending, dismissive tone running through the whole statement, IMO it was not helpful to AS. Particularly the attack on Mary almost immediately followed by the request to the jury consider AS pain and suffering. Attack Greer ok, hes presenting the case ..but attack Mary?
I also noticed a distinctive drop in tone of voice and level and pitch of volume when discussing RZ apparent reason for suicide. It was not natural IMO, as as soon as the next topic came up he did not dwell a pause before returning to the voluminous levels prior.
Overall, I felt like I was being talked down too if that makes sense. As though by choosing the plaintiffs version I was stupid as its SO obvious that there is no evidence...
I genuinely tried to remain open during the trial, and I did during Webbs argument, but for me he was unpersuasive and not very likable.
This is just me, and my opinion, but I would decide for the plaintiff.
I have known the Alison's for many years. To suggest that Mrs. Alison should be a murder suspect is preposterous! I also find it interesting that LE tried to keep it quiet that she had come forward. I was having coffee with the Alison's one Sunday shortly after Rebecca was murdered, and they brought up the fact that Mrs. Alison heard screams that night, and that LE didn't seem to be interested..............
The only place to watch this live is 10 News - Abc San Diego KGTV right?
Yep, I had to refresh the linkGreer is on now.
ullhair:
Shades of the Oscar Pistorius trial.