bettybaby00
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2013
- Messages
- 3,981
- Reaction score
- 11
Warning: Bash me if you'd like..I won't take it personally. .....
It would be human for jurors, maybe especially the men, to listen to what they heard yesterday and wonder why the heck Travis put up with her behavior. (No, I am NOT blaming the victim!)
He's telling a GF that JA has come into his house uninvited, spied on him when he was in his own home with a GF, hacked his emails, read his journals, waited for him outside the bathroom door, taken a ring out of one of his closed drawers, and probably slashed his tires.
He's telling someone that, and warning her that JA will likely take revenge on her just because he's speaking to her. He's also expressing his belief JA has an accomplice who is essentially stalking two of his GF's.
As a juror, it would make me need to understand why he didn't draw an absolute line in the sand with her. DM went a long toward explaining this, by saying he thought she might really commit suicide if he did that.
It helps that they also have the history of other BF's being equally incapable of handling her. If jurors don't have these explanations firmly in mind I can imagine that they might at least consider one of her other mitigators on the list......that she was especially vulnerable to and affected by their tumultuous relationship (defined loosely).
Not because he was being abusive (I think that's been discredited), but because her BPD made her extremely likely to misinterpret ANY intimate contact.
no one is going to bash you bring up very valid points .points that any one of these jurors might conclude are valid and mitigating.
i started a long rambling post about all the reasons i think that BPD isn't a mitigating factor, but its all been said before.
for me it wouldn't factor outweigh the crime(s) she's committed.
BPD does not excuse murder, it doesn't preclude a person from understating right and wrong. she doesn't have a compromised IQ, and her age actually plays against her IMO. she wasn't a child, and given how long she lived on her own, she should have been even more mature than some other 27 yo. she knew full well what she did was wrong, or she wouldn't have tried to cover it up. in many instances of a DV victim killing their abuser, THEY ARE THE ONES THAT CALL POLICE, and admit what they've done.
What would also really sway me as a juror is the fact that despite mentioning BPD in their opening, the DT has offered zero in the way of how that played into JAs actions. Instead they've spent months and months blaming the victim, while making the most vile accusations against him.
Now Nurmi is going to try and tell the jurors that BPD is the reason she did it????? SMH
ok, I'm starting to rant again ..:blushing:
all MOOOOOOOO