She sounds smart to me, too. And, I am at the same "not so fast with the outing/bodyslam party" as you are.
![Smile :) :)]()
I just want the SA to be
very, very careful and not be blindsided at trial. I want to know everything that could possibly come up to discredit Melich or any other LE investigator in advance. My mind is wide open.
I was just pointing out that the FDLE investigator stated in his summary that he found her to be truthful. So, if we can find out otherwise, I want to do it now. Oh, and I know her first statement to FDLE was not sworn, however, when she sat down for the 2nd interview after consulting her attorney, I am pretty sure that she was sworn in. So, that makes your point even more valid.
Because the only thing I see she could really get in trouble for is lying to an LE officer, especially under a sworn statement.