I am angry because people are so willing to toss Ronald under the proverbial bus without a shred of evidence he did anything which led to the disappearance of Haleigh,
I'm sorry, but I, and I think others,
do see reasons to believe he did. I think it's clear LE does too.
but are more than willing to overlook ANYTHING Crystal or others have done!!
I spoke to that in my last post.
And I think it is unwise and counterproductive for
anyone on either side to see this as good parent vs bad parent. It does make people angry, and it also blinds us to seeing things we can't see from either side of the fence.
Polarization is never healthy.
His lifestyle includes working not one, but two jobs to support his children. His lifestyle includes providing a decent roof over their heads and food on the table. I don't see any comments on the positive things he currently does for his children here!
People from very good to very evil can say the same, so I don't see the relevance, SS. It does not mitigate the concerns we have, because it does not make the reasons for the concerns any less real.
(Don't make me list the reasons. I'm confident that we could all list them - for both.)
He USED to be involved with drugs. He USED to be this or that. What really matters is who Ronald is NOW and if he was involved in Haleigh going missing. I don't see he was directly involved in his daughter's disappearance and until LE arrests him (which I do not believe they will)...I have no reason to suspect him. To keep going down the path of ruining this man's life to me because some may not like him is not right, imo.
We don't know if or when he stopped being involved in drugs.
And again, a person does not need to believe someone was "involved" to believe they bear some responsibility or that their issues and associations are relevant to pursue.
What I do not understand is why you think it is so outrageously galling for us not to use kid gloves with Ron, but it's fine to go all out on Crystal. By your stated reasoning
-- that he should be considered a victim until LE arrests him -- Crystal meets the
same standard.
So apparently, it's not a matter of meeting that standard. And it's not a fear of being mean to possible victims or ruining someone's life when they might be innocent; it is not a matter of such objective reasons, but simply a matter of personal convictions and preference that determines whom one feels ok doing it to.
(I'll say this again, in case it was missed: I don't think he harmed her. I think it is most likely an associate or enemy of his or Misty's, and Crystal's family runs a close second. But I do think all the adults in her life failed to put the best interests of those children first.)