Snipped by me...I found this interesting as I was reading along and Capt. Shauland using the word
"However" after talking about Rons alibi for work..that speaks loudly to me...
---------------
ISSUES WITH JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL
Twists in Haleigh Search; Octo-drama; Desperate Search; No Discovery in Haleigh Cummings Search; Hearings Begin in Zanny the Nanny Lawsuit; Brother of Mauled Woman Considers Lawsuit
Aired February 27, 2009 - 19:00:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED
SHAULAND: Well, nobody has been excluded as a suspect because we just don`t know what happened to Haleigh. We don`t know anything about her whereabouts. As you can well imagine, somewhere down the line when all likelihood we`ve got a crime involved in the disappearance of Haleigh.
And so we are trying to keep the criminal investigation alive and we`ve not ruled out anybody because we don`t know what the crime is at this point.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: I guess --
SHAULAND: As far as --
VELEZ-MITCHELL: Just to follow up on that, Captain, quite often in other criminal cases, let`s say when a woman is murdered, usually immediately police look at the significant other, the husband or boyfriend.
And then as his alibi is verified and they find out yes, he was spotted at work at the time, and that person is formally excluded as a suspect, that`s what I`m talking about.
Obviously, for example, Ron`s alibi was that he was at work. And that`s firm, right?
SHAULAND: That`s correct. That is his alibi and
he was at work. We were able to check that.
However, again we don`t know what happened to Haleigh and we don`t when it happened.
So we`re in the process of interviewing and re-interviewing. And a lot of times this gets confused with questioning. Many times we just
have new information that comes in as a part of the leads. And we then have to reaffirm it or affirm it or find out that it is a false lead.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0902/27/ijvm.01.html