0136257]
It has nothing to do with batterrng. He could have simply grabbed her in anger. She probably bruises easily. I bumped my shoulder on a doorway the other day and have a mild but visible bruise. It was barely a bump.
Why wouldn't he? He doesn't want to admit to the world and his sole surviving son, who by they way is seriously ill, that he lied to protect the double DD's instead of exacting justice for his other two sons. Would not exaclty reflect well on him now would it?
OTOH, what does he gain by telling the truth? She is already on death row, so it's not like justice hasn't been served. Besides, the Darlieites would just call him a liar and discount it anyway so what possible up side is there to him speaking out now?
Not in the slightest.
.So you are saying he battered his wife's arms to get his frustration out for her killing their two sons and then realised that he felt a lot better so stood by her side for 16 years
It has nothing to do with batterrng. He could have simply grabbed her in anger. She probably bruises easily. I bumped my shoulder on a doorway the other day and have a mild but visible bruise. It was barely a bump.
And now they're divorced - he's still standing by her knowing she's guilty?
Why wouldn't he? He doesn't want to admit to the world and his sole surviving son, who by they way is seriously ill, that he lied to protect the double DD's instead of exacting justice for his other two sons. Would not exaclty reflect well on him now would it?
OTOH, what does he gain by telling the truth? She is already on death row, so it's not like justice hasn't been served. Besides, the Darlieites would just call him a liar and discount it anyway so what possible up side is there to him speaking out now?
I think that is a little far fetched don't you?
Not in the slightest.