How do you know he didn’t use those roads?
Could account for some of the extensive cctv gathered?
Good point, I don't know, I presumed he would not because of the cameras, but I see your point, clearly. They do keep those for months ,, I believe, there was some argument about it, NSW kept theirs for weeks, but then,, it seemed more prudent to keep the clips for years.. VICPOL has always promoted keeping the highway film in perpetuity, makes sense to me.
Having said that, I still think he took back roads, and bush tracks.. he was already in the murk with the Highway patrol from the incident back in September, and it seems reasonable to me, that he was on a restricted licence for that matter, ( it was the kind of offence that results in one's licence being immediately hampered..) he would not want to be picked up out of his allowed radius especially on that Sunday morning... I think the CCTV is other stuff, more graphic stuff, stuff that cannot be interpreted any other way than the occurrence of Mrs Murphy's deliberate murder by Stephenson.
( VICPOL puts your registration number into the data base on the camera's, it spits out the info of you on the road with your restricted licence, and Highway Patrol saddles up and blammo, there you go , again. )