Australia Samantha Murphy, 51, last seen leaving her property to go for a run in the Canadian State Forest, Ballarat, 4 Feb 2024 *Arrest* #9

Does any one think it might be possible that the alleged offender has started to cooperate with Police, and told them a location???
And police are keeping this information quiet for the moment???

Perhaps the reality of incarceration is sinking in for the alleged offender??

Just a thought and IMO
Count me out, Slouthy.... He has a lot invested in his silence, ... Because I don't think he has had a barrister assigned to him, or has and he has fired them one after the other.. Until his barrister says, it's him co operating, I've got him down as Mr Deep Sulk.
 
But if that is her phone why weren't we told from the beginning when police told the public to keep and eye out for her phone that it was in a case surely her family knew her phone was in a case. And why a dam so close to a house their are hundreds of dams in the area and plenty of them are no where near anything?

Don't get me wrong I 10000% hope it is her's and that this is the clue they need but as always I have questions
 
Yes, this is the location mentioned. Note the chilling name of the road:

"On Wednesday, police conducted a small-scale search along Slaughterhouse Road and Buninyong-Mt Mercer Road, a couple of kilometres south of Buninyong."


This is far closer to a house than I thought it would be. Very ballsy place to put a body, if she is indeed there. Even if you stopped to throw a phone or any other evidence there, it's not as secluded as you would imagine, and close to a road too. Yes, the buildings look to be a red brick house, and a grey, 3 door shed/garage. Very normal looking home and garage for a country property. Many people have sheds this big for their toys - cars, boat, caravan, jet skis etc, or to house farming equipment or tools of a trade, or many convert areas to a "man cave" with a TV, bar, seating, an additional toilet etc. Another recent photo appeared to show other buildings in the area, which looked to me like other properties, not further out buildings.

The question has to be asked - did the alleged murderer know the owners of this property? Did he know they were not home at the time that the items/body were put here? Did he allegedly dispose of items or a body under the cover of darkness? Did he just get lucky (until now) that this certain spot had not been searched as thoroughly as it appears to be now, and that nobody witnessed him do anything unusual?

I have zero clue how the IMEI tracing thingy works on phones. Could her phone now have become close enough to the surface of the water that it can be traced, even turned off, out of charge and water logged?
Lenses alter apparent distances. It's a couple of hundred metres from the house to the dam, and as I said, I think they're on adjacent properties.
 
But if that is her phone why weren't we told from the beginning when police told the public to keep and eye out for her phone that it was in a case surely her family knew her phone was in a case. And why a dam so close to a house their are hundreds of dams in the area and plenty of them are no where near anything?

Don't get me wrong I 10000% hope it is her's and that this is the clue they need but as always I have questions
We have never been given a description of Sam's phone or watch. Not a colour or anything.
Or if Sam had jewellery on (earrings, ring, etc).
Possibly hold-back information in case they could ever get the accused to talk.

imo
 
Not what I wanted to hear, Scooby, but still...this is the best break we've heard of in this case for a long while. Another piece of the puzzle. Hopefully the forensic analysis of the phone (and other possible items found) will help the investigation.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
90
Guests online
2,064
Total visitors
2,154

Forum statistics

Threads
594,858
Messages
18,013,876
Members
229,532
Latest member
Sarti
Back
Top