agree, and he is sooo good looking too Yuri's a true:hero:Thanks for that link. I had to watch Yuri again -- he keeps looking at Jose like he is quite an <unusal person>.
Yuri's facial expressions are priceless!!
Mel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
agree, and he is sooo good looking too Yuri's a true:hero:Thanks for that link. I had to watch Yuri again -- he keeps looking at Jose like he is quite an <unusal person>.
Yuri's facial expressions are priceless!!
Mel
Love that smilie. How could JB have known it was recorded? Just because prisons record inmates telephone chats? :loser:Remember Robin Lunceford, hone: JB said that he didn't know the call was recorded.
Baez claims to be working for "slave wages", another comment that should have been kept to himself.
Made to a VERY RESPECTED, African American Judge.:waitasec:
Quite frankly, the forensic evidence is not advantageous for my client. Unfortunately, I can’t absolutely believe the depositions, so it’s not advantageous for us, so we can’t ask intelligent questions. Sorting through the wealth of new information is Paramount! This case will boil down to law enforcement not doing a thorough investigation. If a more thorough investigation had been done, my client would be at home making salmon patties right now. Aaah, you can quote me on that! Attorney Jose Baez
I have to make a comment and I am not sure if this is the right thread or not so I am sorry if I am wrong. It is very aggravating that the DT constantly rips on "blogs" but at the same times takes what certain members formulate, figure out, dissect, conclude etc and uses it to their advantage. I love reading all of the comments, thoughts, and actual law based opinions here but if frys(yes i know it is spelled wrong) my bottom that they get to use the wonderful minds of people for the own gain and openly bash these same folks. I wish they could not see what is being said on the blogs...
I agree. I posted over on the questions thread that I found it bizarre (to say the least) that the DT is actually reading blogs in real time while in open court arguing for somebody's life. Strange indeed.
It's my opinion that many of the blogs are monitored as a result of a lesson learned by the DT.
Case in point; Go back to the duct tape threads here at WS and look at some of the in depth analysis of both the composition and market availability of the tape used to wrap little Caylee's face. The words "most common tape in America" would have never left Mr. Baez's mouth had anyone on the DT been monitoring this site at that time.
That's just ONE example of many that leads me to believe they are here for knowledge and information they do not possess.
Now we know why JB can't ask intelligent questions. It's because the evidence and the depos are faulty. And I thought it was because JB struggled through the Florida Bar Exam three times. :tos:
My, my I wonder if HHJP has seen this letter. Sounds like even JB as acting as an "agent for the state".
Morning everyone
This man makes me feel alot better about the case because I just don't trust JB and Mason and their antics....
http://www.wftv.com/video/27321100/index.html
Thanks for that link. I had to watch Yuri again -- he keeps looking at Jose like he is quite an <unusal person>.
Yuri's facial expressions are priceless!!
Mel
I found the dog handler testimony today quite disturbing. Jose went so far as to say "what did the dog tell you". I'm paraphrasing, but that's certainly what the man insinuated.
um...Jose....dogs can't talk
Mel
Now, HOW is Mr Baez gonna AMBUSH anyone with his feet nailed to the floor?I know I posted this in a few threads, but this is the perfect example of what I am talking about. It isn't just the snarkiness or complete rectal cranial inversion of some of JB's comments. It is also that he seems completely clueless as to what his actual audience is. That comment about "what did the dog tell you?", yeah that might have scored him some laughs and a few points for clever with a disparate and somewhat bored pack of jurors. That might be a moment that they remember. But he is in an evidence hearing where the only audience that counts is the skilled experienced and professional observer wearing the black robe and sitting at the big desk. He is presenting for the judge. The judge does not want cute and clever. Especially not in a Frye hearing. The judge has already wasted 2 days on this nonsense. The judge is a consummate professional at filtering out exactly what he needs to make his decision from the sea of verbal chaff. All he wants is good solid information.
Watch LDB's handling of witnesses during this hearing. Note how direct she is with them. Both her own and the defenses witnesses. Notice how quickly and succinctly she gets the information that she needs from each. No double talk. No cuteness. No cleverness. No Perry Mason gotcha's. No snark. She knows she is presenting to the judge and quickly and efficiently elicits exactly the information he needs to make his decision.
JB just completely misses that. I mean the nastiness, snarkiness and such with the dog handler. The request to treat the witness as hostile. To what end. You don't need drama when presenting to the judge. You need facts and clear testimony. All JB did was create hostile witnesses (and a hostile judge, hostile opposing council, hostile co-council, a hostile gallery (well OK CA was pretty hostile beforehand so maybe not JB's fault)).
I'm actually most surprised that HHJP has not yet ordered the Bailiff to nail JB's feet to the floor in front of the podium to prevent him from wandering and pacing for dramatic purposes like a TV Lawyer.
I know I posted this in a few threads, but this is the perfect example of what I am talking about. It isn't just the snarkiness or complete rectal cranial inversion of some of JB's comments. It is also that he seems completely clueless as to what his actual audience is. That comment about "what did the dog tell you?", yeah that might have scored him some laughs and a few points for clever with a disparate and somewhat bored pack of jurors. That might be a moment that they remember. But he is in an evidence hearing where the only audience that counts is the skilled experienced and professional observer wearing the black robe and sitting at the big desk. He is presenting for the judge. The judge does not want cute and clever. Especially not in a Frye hearing. The judge has already wasted 2 days on this nonsense. The judge is a consummate professional at filtering out exactly what he needs to make his decision from the sea of verbal chaff. All he wants is good solid information.
Watch LDB's handling of witnesses during this hearing. Note how direct she is with them. Both her own and the defenses witnesses. Notice how quickly and succinctly she gets the information that she needs from each. No double talk. No cuteness. No cleverness. No Perry Mason gotcha's. No snark. She knows she is presenting to the judge and quickly and efficiently elicits exactly the information he needs to make his decision.
JB just completely misses that. I mean the nastiness, snarkiness and such with the dog handler. The request to treat the witness as hostile. To what end. You don't need drama when presenting to the judge. You need facts and clear testimony. All JB did was create hostile witnesses (and a hostile judge, hostile opposing council, hostile co-council, a hostile gallery (well OK CA was pretty hostile beforehand so maybe not JB's fault)).
I'm actually most surprised that HHJP has not yet ordered the Bailiff to nail JB's feet to the floor in front of the podium to prevent him from wandering and pacing for dramatic purposes like a TV Lawyer.
:goodpost:
Great post actually. I simply cannot believe that JB is allowed to give a witness a 100 page document and not tell him where to go as a reference point. He just makes the witness shuffle through the entire thing. It is maddening to me.
Although I'm sure it's difficult (especially when being questioned by the DT), I wish the facial expressions would be kept to a minimum. JA has this tendency at times as well. It just reads a little theatric to me. Yuri's testimony is strong, let that speak for itself.
I have to respectfully disagree...I think YM does a very good job of keeping his facial expressions in check. Isn't it funny how people can see the same thing differently? Must be handler's bias:floorlaugh:
Seriously, though I had to sit in a trial and listen to my husband's wife OUT RIGHT lie on the stand. By commission and ommission. The things she said were absolutely infuriating and my attorney had to tell me to cut it out a few times when my mouth went slack. It is very very hard. Especially for those of us with an Irish temper. I find it hypocritical of CA to be calling out JA on it though since she and CA and GA haven't been able to master the art of the stone face.
Baez claims to be working for "slave wages", another comment that should have been kept to himself. JMHO
Justice for Caylee
Okay, Strawberry, now you have me totally confused. Your husband's wife...wouldn't that be you? lol
:floorlaugh:
God forbid!!! I meant ex-husband's wife!!