Found Deceased SC - Brittanee Drexel, 17, Myrtle Beach, 25 April 2009 - #6

[KCaswell]

I just find it really hard to wrap my head around the times...

It was stated by MBPD that the cam times had to be adjusted...the times on the cams were wrong...

Then...

It was stated by a couple people in "the know" that those times weren't right (when I first listed the time line over on FB)...

Then...

Both DD & JP (who are 2 people who should definitely be in the know) come out with the supposed correct times on the WCMF audio files and then this is in subsequent news articles...

Now...

We have this comment by made by a fellow poster...that the media had the times right and the family and lawyer didn't...

Why would the media, who was supposedly wrong, now have the right information over the family?

MBLover-
The times were adjusted FROM the 7:55 & 8:13 times. Those comments on WCMF could have been from prior to the tapes being researched & corrected, honestly I don't know, that is not my call or place to say. But I know that I was told this by more than just DD. And like I said there are more discrepancies-I will not go into them- that even come from her as well, if you look you will easily see them. Personally I think it is a waste of time to sit and discuss which time frame is correct or not. As we all know that the texts went until well after either times and that she was the one that was texting JG not someone else by the way the texts were worded and how she responded. My point in giving the information was not to create this idea over who was right or wrong but rather that there was not a gap between 8:20 & 8:45.

 

[KCaswell]

KCaswell,
Just wanted to give you a huge shout out for helping to keep the facts straight. You are sooo right in the fact that you can find all sorts of media stories, and the first one be contradicted by the next one, and that one contradicted by a third one, ect. It keeps us informed of the true facts, and definitely keeps us on the right trail so to speak. If you do have the chance to speak to DD and JG again, please let them know that there are those of us who are keeping them and Brittanee in our prayers, and will do whatever we can to help them get Brittanee back home safe to them.

:grouphug::grouphug::grouphug::grouphug:

eeyorelrn

eeyorelrn-
I appreciate the shoutout but honestly, DD reads here so you have just told her on your own!
There really is a ton more info that is out there and people could find but it takes a lot of time but I am not comfortable giving out. I also know that there is more info not being given out and for the safety of Britt and her case I am not going to discuss either. From day one her return was my main concern so while I would like to straighten somethings out there are other things that I just have to leave be for her sake.

 

[MBLover]

MBLover-
The times were adjusted FROM the 7:55 & 8:13 times. Those comments on WCMF could have been from prior to the tapes being researched & corrected, honestly I don't know, that is not my call or place to say. But I know that I was told this by more than just DD. And like I said there are more discrepancies-I will not go into them- that even come from her as well, if you look you will easily see them. Personally I think it is a waste of time to sit and discuss which time frame is correct or not. As we all know that the texts went until well after either times and that she was the one that was texting JG not someone else by the way the texts were worded and how she responded. My point in giving the information was not to create this idea over who was right or wrong but rather that there was not a gap between 8:20 & 8:45.

I'm sorry if you feel this time discussion was a waste of time. Not everyone may be as privy to this information that you are. I have yet to see any thing posted going back to the "corrected" time frame. After reading approx. 100+ articles with the first ones stating those later times first...then those times being dismissed in favor of the earlier times and that those were supposedly the correct times.

Time is a factor in any investigation and all of this information that has been put out about this case - some good, some bad - IMHO seems to have hindered instead of helped. I do not understand all of this misinformation and then the clearing up of it...only to go back to what was first said (and I'm not just talking about times)...

It would appear to me that if help is wanted and needed (as far as potential witnesses)...then one would think that correct info would be helpful in finding people instead of confusing them with items that are not fact.

I fully understand why ALL facts and details cannot be laid out, however to me it seems no information would be better than misinformation. (And KCaswell - that was not directed at you...that was directed at all of the media that has presented stories in this case)

I don't believe it was ever stated that it was definitely known that BD was the one doing the texting right up until it stopped and I appreciate you stating that.

The later times to make a tighter time line.

 

[MBLover]

Also- the Myspaces-those were deleted in agreement between Brittanee & JG because of all the drama it was causing w/the 2 of them. The "brittylush" page out there is being run by someone else that neither DD, JG or TVF seem to know. She has been asked to call DD and has not. So you have to ask yourself- what kind of friend is that to have all that info and pics out there of her friend and refuse to call your friends mother? There has also been a Myspace noted on these threads for JG- J fcukin_Gotti-that one is fake as well. I happen to mention it to JG and he had no clue what I was talking about. Seems someone is running something on that as well. JG has no social networking site at all.

So w/this my question would be-w/as many times as kids have sent up fake pages of eachother "picking" on one another is this what that "Brittylush" page was? Or was someone copying her page over and pretending they were her for attention? After all we know there was plenty of reason to be jealous of her. Or did she really have a 2nd page set up....but keep in mind, most of the info on the page , the "about me" facts, from what I have been told are pretty much 100% wrong.

I really have to wonder what person would take the time to go to great lengths and make fake MS pages. What would be their motive for doing so. The "Brittylush" page being up for approx. 2 years and the JG page going back to at least Winter of 2009.

What would someone have to gain from doing this?

If I remember correctly there was a comment made by JG on the Brittylush MS way back when. Why would BD's bf make a comment on a fake page?

I don't know about JG's page that is mentioned above in the quote, but IMO would have to believe that the Brittylush page was done by BD. I don't know how anyone could copy comments that come from other MS pages...since those have to be sent by that person's MS. It's not like you can just copy and paste photo comments or page comments.

 

[Debbie Miller]

I really have to wonder what person would take the time to go to great lengths and make fake MS pages. What would be their motive for doing so. The "Brittylush" page being up for approx. 2 years and the JG page going back to at least Winter of 2009.

What would someone have to gain from doing this?

If I remember correctly there was a comment made by JG on the Brittylush MS way back when. Why would BD's bf make a comment on a fake page?

I don't know about JG's page that is mentioned above in the quote, but IMO would have to believe that the Brittylush page was done by BD. I don't know how anyone could copy comments that come from other MS pages...since those have to be sent by that person's MS. It's not like you can just copy and paste photo comments or page comments.

I am not sure how the comments got there, but it would be possible to change the account to look as if it were Brittanee's page.

 

[MBLover]

I am not sure how the comments got there, but it would be possible to change the account to look as if it were Brittanee's page.

I'm not going to say that anything is impossible... However the many people I have talked to (from regular every day people to those highly educated in computer science) say there is no way to fake MS, FB or any other networking site comments - as those comments have to come from the person's page who is making them.

The only way, I've been told, that this could happen is if someone hacked their way into a person's page and made the comments their self from someone else's page. Then again...when the person logs into their account and sees that comments have been made to others I would think that they would delete them or at least notify the person who the comments have been made to that this wasn't done by them.

But like I say...why would someone go to this much trouble...and for what reason...

 

[Debbie Miller]

I really don't know. I guess that will be something else that will have to be found out.

 

[MBLover]

I really don't know. I guess that will be something else that will have to be found out.

This is true.

 

[KCaswell]

All I know is that I talked to JG & DD on the phone at the same time and JG pulled up both pages and had never seen them before. They both read the info on Britt's page and said it was all the wrong info. JG said that the page loaded as his was not his and he hadn't seen it before. He said that he and Britt had deleted their accts a bit before she left for MB. They both also said that they didn't know Kaylee Legretti and neither did TVF so it would seem odd to me that she would have the access to Britts page.
BTW- my husband knows a lot about webpages and says it is not that hard to copy a page and make a duplicate of it. Someone could have easily have copied Britts page before it was deleted and have her info from then and altered what they wanted.....As for her note to JG-someone was pretending they were him....I even sent them a note and they pretended they were him.
None of this really matters, people just need to know that they are being run by people that DO NOT have the best of any intentions.

 

[Debbie Miller]

ok, so that mystery is solved.

 

[Debbie Miller]

Hypothetically, say a total stranger has taken Brittanee. We don't know either way, but I think it warrants a good concern.

The area of the BWR is kind of closed in, did she encounter the perp in this closed in area?

 

[KCaswell]

Hypothetically, say a total stranger has taken Brittanee. We don't know either way, but I think it warrants a good concern.

The area of the BWR is kind of closed in, did she encounter the perp in this closed in area?

Wondering what people will respond w/on this one Debbie....but here is my 2 cents for what it is worth.....
There is one circumstance that I can think of that someone she didn't know could have taken her. It was only in the media once that I know of but both DD & JG have stated that Britt only had vision in one eye, if the perpetrator came upon her on her "bad" side they could have taken her off guard. Thing is that she would have fought them either way, so something like an injection or chloroform would have had to be used to put her under right away.
Here is a thought- for all those that have seen the Jaycee Dugard coverage-don't you wonder if there is anyone that fits that mold in this circumstance? Or something similar? I hope someone has checked into this.......anyone know of any place you could check any databases on this type of info?:waitasec:

 

[MBLover]

If one does the "google walk" - even though these pics aren't quite up to date - you can see where there are several places that BD could have been lured into and taken.

There are a few garages that have entrances and exits directly onto Ocean Blvd. Someone could have feigned illness or injury or maybe someone could have called her name - giving the possibility of her entering one of these places with just a few steps and someone could have grabbed her. Definitely wouldn't have taken much...and with it being completely dark by this time...someone moving quickly...catching her off guard...

And as KCaswell brings up in her last post...something was wrong with one of her eyes...And yes, I do remember hearing that somewhere and her having had surgery last year to correct something with her eye.

A large person is not going to have a problem in "snatching" a 4' 11", 100 pound person - especially if they have done this before and know what they are doing.

 

[Debbie Miller]

Wondering what people will respond w/on this one Debbie....but here is my 2 cents for what it is worth.....
There is one circumstance that I can think of that someone she didn't know could have taken her. It was only in the media once that I know of but both DD & JG have stated that Britt only had vision in one eye, if the perpetrator came upon her on her "bad" side they could have taken her off guard. Thing is that she would have fought them either way, so something like an injection or chloroform would have had to be used to put her under right away.
Here is a thought- for all those that have seen the Jaycee Dugard coverage-don't you wonder if there is anyone that fits that mold in this circumstance? Or something similar? I hope someone has checked into this.......anyone know of any place you could check any databases on this type of info?:waitasec:

I am not familiar with Jaycee Dugard's case, I will have to check it out and get back to you.

 

[Debbie Miller]

Wondering what people will respond w/on this one Debbie....but here is my 2 cents for what it is worth.....
There is one circumstance that I can think of that someone she didn't know could have taken her. It was only in the media once that I know of but both DD & JG have stated that Britt only had vision in one eye, if the perpetrator came upon her on her "bad" side they could have taken her off guard. Thing is that she would have fought them either way, so something like an injection or chloroform would have had to be used to put her under right away.
Here is a thought- for all those that have seen the Jaycee Dugard coverage-don't you wonder if there is anyone that fits that mold in this circumstance? Or something similar? I hope someone has checked into this.......anyone know of any place you could check any databases on this type of info?:waitasec:

Ok , now that I have looked into the case of Jaycee, I think it is highly possible that this could happen again, and maybe to Brittanee.

Sorry I haven't been watching much news lately, but have caught and ear's full about this case, just didn't hear the names.

Familywatchdog.com is one site for offenders. I google SC sex offender registry and it gives you the option of selecting the city, county, and zip, whichever you prefer.

 

[Debbie Miller]

09-091803 9/6/2009 12:13AM 1320 CELEBRITY CR SECTY SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES WF IS AT THE SECURITY OFFICE SAYING THAT SHE
IS BEING STALKED BY WM. SHE IS REQUESTING AN OFC. SHE SAYS WM IS AT​

ANOTHER CLUB


Here is another:

09-091811 9/6/2009 12:25AM AMB ATTEMPT TO LOCATE REF MISSING PERSON FROM BLUEWATER RESORT
TAHESHA MULDROW 15YOA SHE CALLED THE POLICE DEPT AND SAID SHE IS ON
17TH AVE N IN A RED BRICK APT COMPLEX ON A 1ST FLOOR APT WITH A RED
TRUCK AND BLK JEEP PARKED OUT FRONT OF IT IF OFC'S LOCATE HER MAKE
SURE SHE IS OK MOM IS WORRIED ABOUT HER AND TO HAVE HER BE CALLED
AGAIN
​

 

[Debbie Miller]

tuba did respond about the find. it appears it could be a young person. of course we still don't know for sure it was human remains nor if they were male or female so....

I am leaning toward this incident ended up being animal remains. There has been nothing more on this whatsoever.

 

[MBLover]

http://rochester.ynn.com/?RegionCookie=2004&ArId=471742

In this article (it won't let me copy & paste) there are a couple of statements by JH stating that he was in both BD's room at the BH and PB's room at the BWR.

My question - why was someone who is not in LE allowed into either room when LE didn't know what had actually happened?


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,519025,00.html

In this article there is a statement by JG that says he doesn't believe that PB had anything to do with this (meaning BD).

That may well be true, however, I would like to know his reasoning behind this and if he still believes this or has changed his mind.

KCaswell - any help with either of the above?

 

[Debbie Miller]

I have scanned the composite sketch and article on the indecent exposure that happened in April at a couple of the hotels on Ocean Blvd. I can't upload them, it comes back saying there is a security link missing. Can anyone give me advice as to what to do? Thanks in advance.

 

[Debbie Miller]

Police looking into the possible use of Crystal Soles' identity

Email Story

Recommend Story

Printable Version

Discuss







Published on 8/28/2009
Written by By Kelly Marshall Fuller
New clues that could lead to the location of a woman missing five years from Andrews are being investigated by the Andrews Police Department.
Chief Harvey Knox said Friday that someone appears to have been using the social security number of Crystal Gail Soles, a woman who vanished from Andrews on Jan. 24, 2005.
''Our investigator looked into financial transactions,'' Knox said. ``It was nothing in this area.''
Knox said clues are coming in about Soles, but the possible use of her identity is the most recent information to come into the department.
Knox said police have not stopped searching for Soles and still consider her a missing person, not a homicide victim.
Monica Caison, director of the Center for United Effort, stopped in Andrews Friday to give new life to the search for Soles and 17-year-old Brittanee Marie Drexel.
Caison is doing a cross-country tour, stopping in various towns, to spur investigations into cold cases.
Drexel's mother drove from Rochester, N.Y. to be at the event.
Her daughter was last seen April 25 in Myrtle Beach.
Drexel's cell phone was found near the Santee River, leading to a large-scale search in that area.
Anyone with any information about Drexel is asked to call 918-1300.
Andrews investigators can be reached at 264-5223.

Is the following statement a misprint??
Drexel's cell phone was found near the Santee River, leading to a large-scale search in that area.