And she was asked by the officer 5 times to stand?
That's been widely reported. Not new news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And she was asked by the officer 5 times to stand?
Do you think it was because she was new to the school that she wasn't aware of what would happen when the officer was called?
I wonder if she was even aware about the cell phone rule.
That's been widely reported. Not new news.
She is a senior in high school and does not know she needs to listen to her teacher and her vice principal when they ask her to leave the classroom? A senior and she did not know she could not mess with her cell during class time? A senior that did not know that a Deputy has the right to order her out of her desk?
The girl who was interviewed said they all took out their phones because they knew what was coming. How would they know what to expect if they hadn't seen him in action previously?
Okay...I'll check around later because I've been following this case and missed that it was the officer that had asked her 5 times to stand.
I would think that most kids who had attended any school at all would be aware that teachers can get varying degrees of pissy if you are using your cell phone in their class. Most kids will have an "oh $hit" reaction when called out for it. If not at that point, at least when the principal is called. If not then, AT LEAST when the SRO is called. I gotta hand it to this girl, she's got nerves of steel! If my son gets called out for talking or not paying attention he is still shaken up about it when he gets in the car at the end of the day. Often he has some BS story about how he wasn't REALLY doing anything, but he chooses to accept the supposed "injustice" and comply and fly under the radar for the rest of the day. This seems more typical to me than what the student in this case did.
And the jury found him NOT GUILTY in the first case. Just because someone sues you it does not mean you are guilty.
The second case is still ongoing. He is one of TEN defendants that accused a student of being a gang member. The student denies he is a gang member. I am sure there were reasons that the SRO thought the student was an active gang member. Was he mistaken? POssibly. But that does not make him 'violent.'
So we have ONE CASE from 2007, where the court sided with him. And one where he is one of ten people, being sued by a disgruntled student. And it is not about excessive force.
We have heard from two of the other students and I have yet to hear from anyone that was there that day that she did anything other than take out her phone for a peek. One even said she was apologetic about it and she insisted she had done nothing wrong.
Both students appear well spoken and polite and I have no reason to suspect they are saying anything other than what they observed that day.
My take so far is that we have a teacher that totally mishandled this situation and it went from there. IMO
I've been following closely and I haven't seen that either, and it's not apparent from watching the video. He barely gives himself enough time to say it once.
Okay...I'll check around later because I've been following this case and missed that it was the officer that had asked her 5 times to stand.
We have heard from two of the other students and I have yet to hear from anyone that was there that day that she did anything other than take out her phone for a peek. One even said she was apologetic about it and she insisted she had done nothing wrong.
Both students appear well spoken and polite and I have no reason to suspect they are saying anything other than what they observed that day.
My take so far is that we have a teacher that totally mishandled this situation and it went from there. IMO
IMO that is a lot of complaints against an officer on the force for only 7 or 10 yrs.
IMO that is a lot of complaints against an officer on the force for only 7 or 10 yrs.
The tweets at the link probably count as rumour, but this is from a reporter's verified account:
[video=twitter;658753751889657856]https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/658753751889657856[/video]
Story:
http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2015...icer-violently-slams-teen-girl-to-the-ground/
Ok, but if she truly put her phone away after one peek I would think she would have more of an "oh $hit!" reaction when then SRO walks in. My son would have wet his pants!
We have heard from two of the other students and I have yet to hear from anyone that was there that day that she did anything other than take out her phone for a peek. One even said she was apologetic about it and she insisted she had done nothing wrong.
Both students appear well spoken and polite and I have no reason to suspect they are saying anything other than what they observed that day.
My take so far is that we have a teacher that totally mishandled this situation and it went from there. IMO
TWO complaints in 10 years is a lot? And in the second complaint, he is one of ten defendants. It is not against him personally.
My understanding is that she is a foster child so IMO it's possible she may have attended schools that were very different than this one. Just a thought on my part.
I don't doubt she was scared. Who wouldn't be.
I think she glanced at her phone and was called on it by the teacher who asked her to give him her phone,so it sounds as though putting the phone away wasn't an option for her.
Without being there it would be hard to say how it went down,but from the accounts of the only two students we have heard from and the media reports saying she refused to give up her phone...it wasn't a matter of simply putting her phone into her purse or pocket.