Since there's only one other Heather Elvis in the area, isn't HIPAA law being broke by saying it was a different HE at the hospital, since it automatically points to the other HE?
And just because they have the same first and last name, how do they know they are "distant cousins"? Is that one of those "You're related to everyone with your last names" things?
It's here:
http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=996452#.UuXgTLTTnDc
"According to an Horry County police report, hours before she disappeared, Heather was admitted to a hospital, something that Terry and Horry County police now confirm is inaccurate.
"Even I thought by name that it would be her. It didn't make any sense but it was checked out earlier that morning and it was found out that it wasn't the right Heather," Terry said.
Apparently, the Heather Elvis referred to in the report was a distant cousin with the same name."
So, she talked to OM last. Roommate said she "seemed upset" when they talked bc he was leaving his wife. When asked by LE about HE he said he last saw her in Oct then admitted to talking to her last night (during interview on 12/19 due to saying last night). Can't conclude a lie because we really don't know what was asked or answered. What are the other FACTS that make people think this first foul play and second OM?
I am in a state of confusion. Would like to understand the facts of why people got to the foul play opinion. Thanks.
I suspect foul play first (but am open to other possibilities) because she came in around 2:00am, sat down and started posting, spoke with her roommate( see link below), then did not respond (to my knowledge) to anyone
after the last phone calls at 6:00 am, calls reportedly between HE and OM.
http://www.myhorrynews.com/news/local/aynor/article_e27b8722-81fa-11e3-a440-001a4bcf6878.html
"According to the report, the last phone calls were at about 6 a.m. Dec. 18, about four hours after Elvis and Shiraldi ended their date.
The calls were back and forth between the victim and the older man, the report said."
If it is important enough for HE to call her roommate when she first got home to talk "due to receiving a call from a man the report says was nearly twice her age." (also at above link), it makes no logical sense that HE would not also call her roommate again after the 6am calls, at least sometime during that day. Yes, my opinion based on facts.
If OM is the last person to speak with HE, suspicion naturally falls to him( ask any LEO). Suspicion also falls to the last known person to see her, but SS has been cleared, and OM has not. Opinion based on the fact that the last person to speak to HE has not been cleared, for whatever reason.
Those are two reasons I suspect foul play.