gremlin444
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2023
- Messages
- 419
- Reaction score
- 5,333
I have learned the hard way, with this case ANYTHING is possible.
No kidding. Like, would any of us really blink if we found out that either of the 2 jurors who signed affidavits turned out to have been related to a former client of Dick, Jim, Alec, or PMPED or a former PMPED client themselves (but not Alec's)? Heck, at this point, I wouldn't even blink if either of those two were found to be a teacher's aide in Paul's 5th grade class, dated John Marvin in high school, or were distant cousins.
I do kind of hope that the defense is able to correct their filing enough that it passes the bar needed to get a hearing of the evidence they have and the state/SLED has regarding the jury and BH. I want to hear D&J get up there and answer why if they knew ANY of this before the verdict why they didn't do anything. I want to hear what SLED has found.
Should BH have written the book when she did, IMHO no. Should she have included something of things she did in it, no matter when it came out? IMHO, no. Do I think she may have made a comment or two that blurred the lines? I can see that. But I don't see her pulling the foreperson into the bathroom in jury room multiple times, nor in aside for a private conversation in front of EVERYONE at the Moselle visit. But if she did, then I want them to show their evidence and for it to be evaluated. If she didn't, then an evidentiary hearing allows her name to be cleared if she is innocent of the accusations. Without a hearing, then people will say "well, they didn't do a hearing because the defense didn't meet the standards, she still did all that stuff."