jillycat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,746
- Reaction score
- 11,841
I am not sure why you find it implausable? It's not implausible to me that she was driving around and contemplating. With that said, how do you suppose the state would have or should have spoke of this coming and going to Longbeards?
I'm not sure why the state's narrative is supposed to be embraced as plausible?
Yes, it's implausible to me that she was driving to a restaurant dumpster area and sitting, then to a housing complex, then back to a restaurant while calling a pay phone, while wondering if she should drive to PTL.
A timeline is just that - all that happens in a given or limited span of time.
But the state wanted the public to have specific information about a phone log, until it came to the pay phone calls she made, which were only referenced as "several", and there was no information on her phone's other movements.
It seems that the PTL theory was the be all, end all focus, no matter what HE was doing right before that.