JA
We know from trial that JA sent some fake messages to herself from Travis. Why would we not entertain the idea that all suspicious computer and phone messages were manufactured by JA? Their styles and choice of wording were very different.
Gus gave her the phone. She spent 5 days with him in his mobile home. Gus was a tech guru. Voice mimicking technology was available at the time. The up and downs of his voice in the sex tape make the whole thing suspect to me.
The sex tape was obviously spliced together. A digital recorder was found in the trash at her grandparents. The first helio phone, which she said was lost, was never put into evidence. Her hard drive was destroyed and the only thing we saw from it was photos. The rest was not admitted because it could not be fully reconstructed.
Some photos of the two of them on trips are suspect. Matt did photoshop for a living.
Travis's journals had to disappear because they would not jive with her journal recording of the events or the story she wanted to sell.
I believe that Travis had sex with SOMEONE once because he lost his Temple Recommend, but I do not believe it was necessarily JA. He was getting it back, so he did not continue to have sex.
In light of all of this I believe that JA was never truly Travis's girlfriend and what we are looking at her is an extreme case of 'if I can't have him, nobody will'.
Was her account of the relationship a product of her 'fruitful imagination' ?
I don't think she made up the relationship. we see through lisa, Deanna, and Mimi how Travis could be when he was interested in a girl. He's charming. He's flirty. He makes you feel very special. That's all fine -- for someone who isn't bi-polar, borderline, etc. He tells friends and exes he loves them. I don't know if every ex understands how to take that, sane or not sane.
He's had a pattern of short relationships--from what we see. He moves quickly, talks marriage right away. Whether that's a common mormon thing, we have to remember that Jodi might not have known it was.
I don't think Jodi was proactive. I think she was reactionary. So I look at what she did, when she did it, and try to figure out what happened to make her react in such a way.
IIRC, she was going with the ninja defense until 2010. Her journals were confiscated or at least copied into evidence in Dec 2008, I believe. Because her first defense was gas cans, I wasn't even there and changed to ninjas, I find it hard to believe she stole the journals or did anything to set up her current defense case prior to 2010. There was no need to. Remember, "no jury will convict me" on the ninja defense.
I see her as believing she wouldn't have to explain anything because "i wasn't there." She'd covered her tracks already, or so she thought. She began making up stuff, bad stories, when she realized she was caught in lies. If we start at the "i was never there" alibi, then we do have to ask ourselves why she'd premeditate a new alibi of self defense in 2008 but instead of using it, use the ridiculous ninja story. If her journals were copied into evidence in december 2008, but self defense didn't come about until 2010, how could she have altered evidence already copied and in JM's hands?
I believe the journals are stamped December 2008 from the evidence clerks. I have to double-check it. But before saying she fabricated evidence for a 3rd defense or alibi that didn't come about until 2010, we have to think of how it's possible to change what's already in JM's custody. She can try to introduce new evidence, which she did, like the forged letters and the sex tape, that's true. But I can't see her altering journals for a defense she hadn't even thought of yet.
And if Matt altered some pics, it would seem like he would have put some bruises on Jodi in some of them.