White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2018
- Messages
- 368
- Reaction score
- 726
I am going to respectfully disagree w. you, WR. ‘Allowing the tape to be overwritten’, as you put it, is merely a more tactful way (i.e. passive as opposed to active) of destroying the contents of the footage.
I am going to respectfully disagree w. you, WR. ‘Allowing the tape to be overwritten’, as you put it, is merely a more tactful way (i.e. passive as opposed to active) of destroying the contents of the footage.
Thank you Sleuth_Noob, I agree, but had Law Enforcement requested to view the video Peter Hackett would have had to either provide it or then deliberately erase it.