RR0004, I do agree that the jurors had the potential to tilt verdicts on each of the phases but refrained from vigorous argument designed to convince. Prior to the sentencing non-verdict, at #1538, p.62 Verdict Watch 4, I did write about persuading the holdout(s) to come around and what was needed. Obviously, that effort was not made. It wasn't laziness but our former jurors were unusually respectful of opposing opinions and reluctant to impose their own even by persuasion.
As for the lethal warning from the node, in the chart for June 20, that persists. It is a very difficult, dire presence. It looms in #1037, p.42 of Sidebar Thread 13 the Status Hearing. No such alert is active or "ripe" in the two charts cast for Nurmi's motion for continuance or Martinez's objection. It is, however, haunting and shadowing the convict because when she is present, it reappears.
lease:
