LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
Thank you for sharing this Bigmomma. I agree with despising her for whatever reasons. She is an adult though and no matter how messed up she's responsible for her actions. I do agree that she is one messed up person and that he did take advantage of her mainly I believe to boost his own career. I still believe that she was and is responsible for the death of Caylee. But I don't agree with what he's done with this book. It's one thing to trash talk your client with your colleagues quiet another to do it with the general public. To me, it's about the same as if your family doctor wrote a book and told people about your private medical issues. I would think that it would be frowned upon. I think that he has a hard-non (you know what I mean) on for George. I think that he's really proud of his opening statement and writing the nasty things about George gives him some sort of satisfaction...if you catch my drift. What other reason would he have to include this trash in his book? Looks like he's throwing digs at George with the pic of his cover with the board, gas can and duct tape and with this entry in his book. It seems personal in that respect and it appears almost as a challange to George to step up and do something about it. I'm still wondering though...being he even stated in court that Casey was a liar...how did he pick and choose to believe what he thought was the truth out of all of her lies. Seems she conned him too. So, he's not as smart as he wants to appear to be. I just throw him in the pile along with Cindy and Mason. They believe whatever it is that she says that makes them feel good. Know what I mean? Was it his insight on Casey that leaves you feeling confused Bigmomma? Consider the source and go with you gut. I hope that you're feeling better.
Didn't defense admit right after the trial that they had used consultants to decide who to pass the blame off to regarding Caylee's death and originally they picked CA but found there was too much sympathy out there for her so they tested the waters with GA and found people were more receptive to believing GA being the "bad" guy and they went after him. Even in the opening statements JB said could not did happen. So now he claims it did happen? Did JB forget what they talked about right after the trial and their strategy? If they knew what happened all along why go after RK? If they knew Caylee drowned why involve all those TES people in an investigation that exposed them to the public. Why was it necessary to discredit all those people? Why, because GA was never the issue until they ran out of options.
Also JB's whining about KC being brought down to watch the monitor the day Caylee was found as her being treated unfairly. KC already knew Caylee was dead, already knew where she was hidden. He made it sound as if she was the victim and we all know she knew Caylee was already dead. Why would he leave himself wide open with that comment? What I see is someone going in and writing an article about everything that is wrong about what JB claims in his book. jmo