Juries are not suppose to take a lead from the judge regarding the case. The judge is there to make sure she gets a fair trial, which is what Judge Perry did......and obviously, very well.
The jury is suppose to think like the adults they are, use their common sense and look at all the evidence. Some of the jury members admitted they had questions but never looked at the evidence that was within the very room where they deliberated. They never used their option to ask the judge questions (which they knew how to do because they asked for pretzels and a number of other things during the trial). They disregarded what instructions were given to them by the judge. So what happened?????
One of them apparently caught the eye of Ms. Anthony which you can see her making eye contact and her expression shows she is happy with the response she is receiving from this person. The courtroom camera is focused on her and she is clearly looking at the jury who was in front of the position where she was seated. So who was she focusing on? If it was a person on the jury, which one? My guess, by the look on her face, it was a male. If someone were infatuated by her there is no way that one person was going to find her guilty. If they put themselves in a position of control there goes the whole jury unless members were self-thinkers. We know that most of the people on this jury were not leaders, but followers....and they proved that. jmo