Simple question...

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

Same writer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 111 81.6%
  • No

    Votes: 25 18.4%

  • Total voters
    136
The FBI stated that there was no evidence of abuse,

Vs. eight doctors and pathologists whose JOB it is to know the signs.

and the US Secret Service stated that there was no indication that PR executed the material in the ransom note.

ONE member of the Secret Service who spends most of his time working a computer vs. ten top-of-the-field experts who say she did.

You're trying to play a chess match with half the pieces gone.

You're asking me to accept the premise that there was staging. I have not accepted that.

You're about the only one.
 
You're asking me to accept the premise that there was staging. I have not accepted that, its not a case fact.

So, are you saying there was no staging? Be careful here because some pretty good fellows are of the opinion it was staged.
 
ONE member of the Secret Service who spends most of his time working a computer vs. ten top-of-the-field experts who say she did.

Was that maybe the eleventh top of field expert who said 99.9% certain JMK wrote the note? LOL
 
So, are you saying there was no staging? Be careful here because some pretty good fellows are of the opinion it was staged.

Be careful? Pretty good fellows? JBR was murdered over 13 years ago, nobody knows who did it and I'm supposed to be careful with any new or differing POV's? Geez lets not step on good fellows toes or anything.

There is no proof anything was ever staged. Thats a myth promoted exclusively by RDI-believers, whether they be medical expert, FBI, CBI, BPD, tabloid hire or investigative reporter.
 
You're reading news from 1996 or something and interpreting it to mean that here in 2010 the FBI believes the R's did it and staged a sex crime coverup.

Sorry, but I'm reading the news from 2008-2010 that has the latest information.


Well show the links...I haven't found any as of yet...Cause last of what I knew,this is an open cold case...But bring the links...Other than John Douglas...Simple enough,
 
You obviously missed my meaning.

Not really. I'm asking you why you didn't think of the anti-capitalist angle when JR did? JR is the top expert on this case and he maybe doesn't know it.

I had thought of the anti-captialist angle also.

Aren't you interested in a solution, regardless of who did it?
 
There is no proof anything was ever staged. Thats a myth promoted exclusively by RDI-believers, whether they be medical expert, FBI, CBI, BPD, tabloid hire or investigative reporter.

Ah, the last refuge of IDI: the big conspiracy. Fool me once, and all that.
 
Not really. I'm asking you why you didn't think of the anti-capitalist angle when JR did?

I don't think you'd like the answer I've got in mind.

JR is the top expert on this case and he maybe doesn't know it.

I was making an implication as to WHY he's the top expert. LOL

Aren't you interested in a solution, regardless of who did it?

You've got me there, friend.
 
Well show the links...I haven't found any as of yet...Cause last of what I knew,this is an open cold case...But bring the links...Other than John Douglas...Simple enough,

Good luck with that.

The idea that Boulder DA would go out of their way to print an unnecessary exhoneration letter, while the FBI quietly holds contempt for the R's as sex crime stagers and child murderers, is totally absurd.
 
Good luck with that.

The idea that Boulder DA would go out of their way to print an unnecessary exhoneration letter, while the FBI quietly holds contempt for the R's as sex crime stagers and child murderers, is totally absurd.


Oh,that is why so many says Lacy made a mistake in that letter....And condicted herself saying no one can cleared of murder until a conviction is made...That letter really show nothing except Wood made a statement that the poilce didn't say if they would stand by that letter....And being a cold case a new ball game....
 
Oh,that is why so many says Lacy made a mistake in that letter....And condicted herself saying no one can cleared of murder until a conviction is made...That letter really show nothing except Wood made a statement that the poilce didn't say if they would stand by that letter....And being a cold case a new ball game....

I would add that ML made sure to cut the FBI out of the action from the get-go. She made sure they weren't in a position to question her.
 
Oh,that is why so many says Lacy made a mistake in that letter....And condicted herself saying no one can cleared of murder until a conviction is made...That letter really show nothing except Wood made a statement that the poilce didn't say if they would stand by that letter....And being a cold case a new ball game....

Its going to help your argument if the FBI said Lacy made a mistake. They didn't.

I repeat that the FBI standing quiet in the belief of RDI, while Lacy prints and exhoneration letter, is absurd. And this is the argument you're making.
 
Don't hold back. Spit it out.

Okay. I didn't think of it because I didn't have a dead six-year-old and a wife who would most likely die in prison. Is that straight-up enough for you?

I already said that JR is the top expert and should be treated as a witness.

I heard you the first time.

You can spin that along with everything else if you want.

That remark does not merit comment.
 
Its going to help your argument if the FBI said Lacy made a mistake. They didn't.

I repeat that the FBI standing quiet in the belief of RDI, while Lacy prints and exhoneration letter, is absurd. And this is the argument you're making.


No you making the argument,I'm just adding and if the FBI wasn't involved in this case with Lacy then no argument....She didn't want to be questioned by anyone that had more knowledge than her on murder cases....And not wanting the FBI involved is absurd.....
 
Okay. I didn't think of it because I didn't HAVE to think of it.



I heard you the first time.



That remark does not merit comment.

In the context of a witness, I said JR was the top expert. Your spin is that JR is the top expert because he is an accomplice. Thats interesting since he can't be linked to the RN or to the murder or to any imagined prior abuse in any way, shape, or form. So this is all simply your imagination and your spin.

Thats all you have.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
248
Total visitors
423

Forum statistics

Threads
609,192
Messages
18,250,555
Members
234,554
Latest member
erhern
Back
Top