Holdontoyourhat
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 12
Let me spell it out for you: he most likely thought up that angle in the first place!
Yeah, why didn't you? Too busy on the bedwetting/boundary issue?
Let me spell it out for you: he most likely thought up that angle in the first place!
The FBI stated that there was no evidence of abuse,
and the US Secret Service stated that there was no indication that PR executed the material in the ransom note.
You're asking me to accept the premise that there was staging. I have not accepted that.
You're asking me to accept the premise that there was staging. I have not accepted that, its not a case fact.
ONE member of the Secret Service who spends most of his time working a computer vs. ten top-of-the-field experts who say she did.
So, are you saying there was no staging? Be careful here because some pretty good fellows are of the opinion it was staged.
You're reading news from 1996 or something and interpreting it to mean that here in 2010 the FBI believes the R's did it and staged a sex crime coverup.
Sorry, but I'm reading the news from 2008-2010 that has the latest information.
Yeah, why didn't you?
Was that maybe the eleventh top of field expert who said 99.9% certain JMK wrote the note? LOL
You obviously missed my meaning.
There is no proof anything was ever staged. Thats a myth promoted exclusively by RDI-believers, whether they be medical expert, FBI, CBI, BPD, tabloid hire or investigative reporter.
Not really. I'm asking you why you didn't think of the anti-capitalist angle when JR did?
JR is the top expert on this case and he maybe doesn't know it.
Aren't you interested in a solution, regardless of who did it?
Well show the links...I haven't found any as of yet...Cause last of what I knew,this is an open cold case...But bring the links...Other than John Douglas...Simple enough,
Ah, the last refuge of IDI: the big conspiracy. Fool me once, and all that.
Oh, no. I don't give credit for conspiracy. They inadvertantly created a myth of staging.
Good luck with that.
The idea that Boulder DA would go out of their way to print an unnecessary exhoneration letter, while the FBI quietly holds contempt for the R's as sex crime stagers and child murderers, is totally absurd.
I don't think you'd like the answer I've got in mind.
I was making an implication as to WHY he's the top expert. LOL
Oh,that is why so many says Lacy made a mistake in that letter....And condicted herself saying no one can cleared of murder until a conviction is made...That letter really show nothing except Wood made a statement that the poilce didn't say if they would stand by that letter....And being a cold case a new ball game....
Oh,that is why so many says Lacy made a mistake in that letter....And condicted herself saying no one can cleared of murder until a conviction is made...That letter really show nothing except Wood made a statement that the poilce didn't say if they would stand by that letter....And being a cold case a new ball game....
Don't hold back. Spit it out.
I already said that JR is the top expert and should be treated as a witness.
You can spin that along with everything else if you want.
Its going to help your argument if the FBI said Lacy made a mistake. They didn't.
I repeat that the FBI standing quiet in the belief of RDI, while Lacy prints and exhoneration letter, is absurd. And this is the argument you're making.
Okay. I didn't think of it because I didn't HAVE to think of it.
I heard you the first time.
That remark does not merit comment.