Small Details that are interesting in the Cooper Harris case, #2

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
ScarlettScarpetta said:
Not all guys are into *advertiser censored*. I don't care what the statistics say.. It is a small sample they ask and then come up with a number.
Click to expand...

Not everyone who accesses *advertiser censored* is an addict (although I believe those numbers are surprisingly high), but I would guess the number of men (and women) who look at *advertiser censored* on a regular basis is very high. Not everyone gets caught.......

These numbers are a little outdated--could even be higher now:

"One psychotherapist has even gone so far as to label the phenomenon 'the crack cocaine of the internet'. The statistics speak for themselves: 12 per cent of all websites are pornographic, 25 per cent of all search engine requests are pornographic, and 35 per cent of all internet downloads are pornographic. 'Sex' is the most-searched word on the internet."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...oys-middle-class-marriage-.html#ixzz395sJElel
 
Where did *advertiser censored* come from? I thought it was sexting. Do you have a link? Are you just referring to pictures and text or actual videos uploaded?

All posts are MOO
 
gngr~snap said:
Where did *advertiser censored* come from? I thought it was sexting. Do you have a link? Are you just referring to pictures and text or actual videos uploaded?

All posts are MOO
Click to expand...

Sexting is a form of *advertiser censored*. My point is that when you have such a large percentage of the population engaging in various forms of *advertiser censored* on a regular basis, it's difficult to include this as a motive for murdering a small child. It's dangerous for people in positions of power to live in bubbles--out of touch with reality.

I think it's necessary to separate RH's sexting with a minor from the rest of this case--it should be dealt with, but on it's own.
 
Evie Ivy Over said:
Sexting is a form of *advertiser censored*. My point is that when you have such a large percentage of the population engaging in various forms of *advertiser censored* on a regular basis, it's difficult to include this as a motive for murdering a small child. It's dangerous for people in positions of power to live in bubbles--out of touch with reality.

I think it's necessary to separate RH's sexting with a minor from the rest of this case--it should be dealt with, but on it's own.
Click to expand...

I don't think sexting and *advertiser censored* are on the same level. This was willing sharing. *advertiser censored* to me is purely spectator sport. I think he is a jerk for doing it but I don't think it necessarily has anything to do with Cooper's Death.
 
Evie Ivy Over said:
Not everyone who accesses *advertiser censored* is an addict (although I believe those numbers are surprisingly high), but I would guess the number of men (and women) who look at *advertiser censored* on a regular basis is very high. Not everyone gets caught.......

These numbers are a little outdated--could even be higher now:

"One psychotherapist has even gone so far as to label the phenomenon 'the crack cocaine of the internet'. The statistics speak for themselves: 12 per cent of all websites are pornographic, 25 per cent of all search engine requests are pornographic, and 35 per cent of all internet downloads are pornographic. 'Sex' is the most-searched word on the internet."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...oys-middle-class-marriage-.html#ixzz395sJElel
Click to expand...

Your reply has nothing to do with what I said. I did not talk about addiction. I just said that I don't believe the numbers on *advertiser censored* and men are right. I don't think that it is as high as they say.
 
Hmm... I wonder if he was into the live web can stuff. I never thought that might be where his money went.

This is totally my opinion, but he does not strike me as a man that is all about satisfying a woman. Women are the for his needs, it doesn't go both ways.
His wife allegedly found out he had cheated on her. I have no way to know what her definition of cheating is. I can see it all being via media, with the exception of an occasional meet up. This would be someone he kept around just to make the wife jealous. Perhaps to have around in case she were to ever leave him...

There is probably a better way to word it.
I can't word what I am trying to say!!

All posts are MOO
 
ScarlettScarpetta said:
I don't think sexting and *advertiser censored* are on the same level. This was willing sharing. *advertiser censored* to me is purely spectator sport. I think he is a jerk for doing it but I don't think it necessarily has anything to do with Cooper's Death.
Click to expand...

Sexting and *advertiser censored* are inclusive:

*advertiser censored*
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*advertiser censored*

"Pornographers have taken advantage of each technological advance in the production and distribution of *advertiser censored*. They have used lithographs, the printing press, and photography. *advertiser censored* is considered a driving force in the development of technologies from the printing press, through photography (still and motion), to satellite TV, other forms of video, and the Internet. With the invention of tiny cameras and wireless equipments voyeur *advertiser censored* is gaining ground. Mobile cameras are used to capture pornographic photos or videos, and forwarded as MMS, a practice known as sexting."

I think the time Stoddard spent on the details of RH's sexting were done for the "WOW" factor Do you think that someone who browses *advertiser censored* on a regular basis has the right to accuse a person who sextes of being an immoral person, or maybe just more immoral?
 
Evie Ivy Over said:
Sexting and *advertiser censored* are inclusive:

*advertiser censored*
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/*advertiser censored*

"Pornographers have taken advantage of each technological advance in the production and distribution of *advertiser censored*. They have used lithographs, the printing press, and photography. *advertiser censored* is considered a driving force in the development of technologies from the printing press, through photography (still and motion), to satellite TV, other forms of video, and the Internet. With the invention of tiny cameras and wireless equipments voyeur *advertiser censored* is gaining ground. Mobile cameras are used to capture pornographic photos or videos, and forwarded as MMS, a practice known as sexting."

I think the time Stoddard spent on the details of RH's sexting were done for the "WOW" factor Do you think that someone who browses *advertiser censored* on a regular basis has the right to accuse a person who sextes of being an immoral person, or maybe just more immoral?
Click to expand...


You know that info is from Wiki, right?
 
Evie Ivy Over said:
??? Can you be more specific?
Click to expand...

Why certainly.

The conversation began iirc when you made the comment about LE really really enjoying the sexting.
I found your comment to be very offensive when considering the task LE has in THIS case.
 
Evie Ivy Over said:
Yes...but I thought it pretty much captured the definition/explanation of *advertiser censored*. If you have something better, maybe you could share it? Thanks...
Click to expand...


I respectfully decline. My feeling is that you are looking for a fight and I ain't biting.

I may be wrong, but your tone is very confrontational.

Have a good night! :loveyou:
 
Originally Posted by TorisMom003
***SNIPPED
And not all guys watch/enjoy *advertiser censored* and/or sexting. Painting them (the officers and men) with such a broad stroke is not only not fair to them, it is also disrespectful to all men.

MOO
Click to expand...

My response:

Originally Posted by Evie Ivy Over
Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean it's not happening.

https://wsr.byu.edu/pornographystats
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Linda7NJ
Your link doesn't refute what you were responding to.
IMO
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Evie Ivy Over
??? Can you be more specific?
Click to expand...

Linda7NJ said:
Why certainly.

The conversation began iirc when you made the comment about LE really really enjoying the sexting.
I found your comment to be very offensive when considering the task LE has in THIS case.
Click to expand...

This was the conversation...which was not the one about LE enjoying the sexting.

Offensive? I think Stoddard's carrying on and on about all the sexting RH did that day and on other days, but yet didn't have any idea what time the sexting started that day shows poor investigation skills, if you ask me. Yes, they DO have a big job...I just hope they are able to focus on the right things and not let sensationalism and exploitation get in the way.
 
EvilSoup said:
I respectfully decline. My feeling is that you are looking for a fight and I ain't biting.

I may be wrong, but your tone is very confrontational.

Have a good night! :loveyou:
Click to expand...

No, not looking for a confrontation...just accepting your challenge!!:angel:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 130 more.
Total: 1,857 (members: 131, guests: 1,726)

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
1,726
Total visitors
1,857
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
605,524
Messages
18,188,320
Members
233,419
Latest member
Missygirl26
Back
Top