It's easy to forget that this is a 1600 ft fall from near the summit to the lake.
View attachment 279939
Google Earth
Yes, the dossier said "The only real possibility for a long fall is from the peak itself"
It's easy to forget that this is a 1600 ft fall from near the summit to the lake.
View attachment 279939
Google Earth
snipped for focus.I'm interested in the overnight she had at the refuge on the 21st before the 2nd ascent to the Pic de S and if she changed her route to return there. Vehicles can drive up to the refuge where it's likely she could /would have accepted a lift from anyone.
The lettuce is bizarre. It contains mostly water and hardly nutrients. I suppose she used it to chew on the leaves, one at the time.
They might have made a nice tuna & potato salad, but I don't get the impression that they did.
It's easy to forget that this is a 1600 ft fall (slide, roll and bounce) from near the summit to the lake.
View attachment 279939
Google Earth
Wow Ruthbullock. That is the most compelling image so far of how catastrophic a fall from the summit of pic de Sauvegarde would be - right into the deep end of Boum de Vanesque with steep gravel walls that would not let you get out, if by chance you survived the initial fall, which is doubtful.FATMAP | Discover a world of adventure...
This is a really good 3D model of the topography of the walking route - only downside is the bit we could do with seeing clearly the bit over the passage to the lacs is sadly in shadow
ETA: sorry was hoping it would link to the refuge and lakes, not just the general whole world
snipped for focus.
You know, patCee, like others here, I keep oscillating between various scenarios that could explain ED's disappearance. One theory I had temporarily put on hold, is coming back to haunt me. Perhaps like you, I am wondering again about a hitchhike gone bad, in particular at the two 'exit' points on her intended loop. There is the Cabane de la Besurtas where she stayed 21/11 and the Hospice de France where perhaps she hung out 23/11 (or if she successfully hiked at dusk/night, 22/11).
Last night I stumbled on this YouTube video posted by ED and DC - it is brief and it is very happy. But they tell a story of getting 8 (yes, eight!) lifts to return to their van from hundreds of kilometers away where they were hiking that day. Wow! That is very trusting - even for a pair that includes a human male.
And so if on 22/11 ED was struggling emotionally (confused / angry / sad / lonely) or physically (hunger / dehydration / exhaustion / illness / cold) might she have opted to abort her trek and get back to civilization 22/11 or 23/11? And given their / her habitual dependence on others for rides, could she have gotten into the wrong car?
Still can't quite understand how easy it would be to fall from the peak? I wonder if it's ever happened before here?
Not sure about her being physically vulnerable,as she is described as very fit and strong, but certainly mentally. Thinking of the conversation she had with Laura who she spent some time with in the mountains, "they were on a break" and not sure whether they would continue together. A real dilemma as I'm not sure how ED would manage to continue her lifestyle alone. Also DCs social media before his illness when he described 'romance gone' and immense loathing. How do you get past that? By the distraction of a new lifestyle? (rhetorical questions).
I'm also surprised DC didn't join ED for a short time on her month away. To his credit he was fit and able to join SAR in the search for her. Though I'm surprised SAR supported that.
I'm interested in the overnight she had at the refuge on the 21st before the 2nd ascent to the Pic de S and if she changed her route to return there. Vehicles can drive up to the refuge where it's likely she could /would have accepted a lift from anyone.
I noticed on some of the posts on SM on the trips with Dan they seemed to be big on what looked like lettuce leaves, often in a sandwich.
"new friend, a warm fire , a jacket potato" (maybe she skipped the tuna being vegan) --> Login • Instagram
I took a snip of that FatMap 3-D image @Ruthbullock provided and boy, it is such a great resource to really see the trail systems in that area. So much so I now realize for the first time that another point of high risk for falling into Baum de Vanesque could be the trail that goes towards Port de Glere from the Refuge de Vanesque, with pic de Sujust on the way (around the corner). I have posted that snip here with red arrows depicting the two steep fall zones that are readily apparent.According to locals, it's common.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/worldnews/13403493/esther-dingley-lake/
"Now, locals fear Dingley may have plunged into freezing waters, explaining why no trace of her has yet been found. “These kind of accidents are sadly very common all year round.
“Over the decades, people have fallen in the still and very deep water, and drowned, or severely injured themselves.
“In the past, it was common for bodies to disappear in the winter, because of the snow and increased water depth, and then to appear in the spring.
“The possibility of someone slipping into water is high, and with nobody else to rescue them or raise the alarm, the consequences can be fatal.”
I feel uncomfortable with 'edges', even infinity pools give me the shudders along with heights. They are mesmeric, calling to come over.Still can't quite understand how easy it would be to fall from the peak? I wonder if it's ever happened before here?
Likely to be lots of people around too, despite the time of year. Just thinking of all the hunters, and the full car park at the ski resort. Along with roads near to the various areas.I only mentioned physically vulnerable due to the food issues.. i.e. a lack of food making her vulnerable physically. As you say, Esther was fit and strong in terms of general fitness!
Interesting thought regarding vehicle access to that refuge. There is no trace of Esther or any of her belongings (so far, anyway) so I think it is definitely an option that her and her gear left the mountain by vehicle.
I took a snip of that FatMap 3-D image @Ruthbullock provided and boy, it is such a great resource to really see the trail systems in that area. So much so I now realize for the first time that another point of high risk for falling into Baum de Vanesque could be the trail that goes towards Port de Glere from the Refuge de Vanesque, with pic de Sujust on the way (around the corner). I have posted that snip here with red arrows depicting the two steep fall zones that are readily apparent.
And... if ED decided perhaps on 22/11 at dusk to skip the Refuge de Vanesque (since no trace of her apparently) and take a 'short cut' from her loop towards Port de Glere to shorten her excursion (due to all the emotional and physical reasons we've been considering), that could put her on that steep section above the lake... at dusk...
View attachment 279946
Image source: FATMAP | Discover a world of adventure...
That post on Instagram includes a comment about "not being 100% motivated" (to do more hiking) but since some people aren't able to get out (reference to lockdowns, I believe) she "should" take advantage of it, or some such verbiage.
The water is 45 m deep. It's impossible to see to the bottom. It's more likely the surface of the water will provide a reflection of the clouds.
I noticed on some of the posts on SM on the trips with Dan they seemed to be big on what looked like lettuce leaves, often in a sandwich.
"new friend, a warm fire , a jacket potato" (maybe she skipped the tuna being vegan) --> Login • Instagram
But where was the sandwich? Great food in summer, in November not so much.
<snipped for focus>
I suppose the roasted potato was ED's Kirschtorte. I never would have believed that this was the only thing she ate when I first saw the post, in fact at the time I was led to believe that the other person had brought an extra potato, just in case.
Totally agree. Experience would tell you that this is not the right kind of food for a hike. Compounded with the overnight and November.... There's no fat, no protein, few calories...It's not rational, when you are always hungry. And it's certainly not rational when your diet isn't adequate to your lifestyle. A lettuce head, some bell peppers and dried oats is very inadequate food for someone on a mountain trail in late Autumn.
I have been thinking about the request for fruit. With the added information provided by LA that Esther did not have a lot of food, I wonder if she gets sugar lows. I get them now and then. I am not diabetic. I just get busy and will forget to eat. My doctor told me to eat a piece of fruit because it works fast. He did lecture me on forgetting to eat and said I still need to eat a regular meal but the fruit will help while I prepare food. I just find it odd to use the “do you have a piece of fruit” as an ice breaker. How about “hello, how is your hike going?” Nothing negative on DC, but maybe he did not want to say Esther does not take enough food because people would think negatively of her? And it would contradict that she was always prepared. When something like this happens I am sure the first instinct is to protect the missing person (a loved one) from negative information. MOO. Just my thoughts and ramblings! MOO!Apologies for my share of this misunderstanding. Actually, there is context missing here.
My sentence responded to a post by another poster, and includes personal observations about times when my safety has been risked by hikers I don't know and who expected me to accommodate them.
My sentence does not reflect or refer to tabloid press. We have ED's own words, as well as the dossier. I'm not sure I've even read the tabloids.
I have asked the mod to remove my quoted post, so there's no further confusion.