SuziQ
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 39,600
- Reaction score
- 52,014
IMO Brodsky is trying to throw mud and make it look like someone else is a suspect. Brodsky said that there was a "Mr. Cales" that was now in jail as a sex offender. Brodsky felt he should be looked at because he was the person that Stacey was meeting that day to paint with. Brosky never said this was Stacey's brother. Pam, the family spokesperson, was the one that said that Yelstin being a sex offender had no relevence to Stacey missing at all. She wanted to know why Brodsky would make that comment when he represented someone who dated and married 16 year olds when he was 46 year old. She stated in her opinion DP was a sex offender. I don't remember Yelstin being the person Stacey was meeting to paint with. I thought it was Cassandra's boyfriend. Methinks Brodsky is mixing up his stories in an effort to make someone else look like they had a motive or could possibly be a suspect. Lame try IMO
I love how Pam turned this around on Brodsky. Everything Pam said is true. IIRC, the crime Yelton is in jail for isn't any worse than what Drew commited with Stacy. My understanding is that Stacy's brother is still in jail, or at least was at the time Stacy went missing. And Stacy was supposed to meet Cassandra and her friend, (Bruce?), to paint. IIRC, the house used to be rented by Yelton, and because he was in Jail, they were going to paint it for him so it could be re-rented out.
Brodsky is not only dumber than a bed or rocks, he's several cards short of having a full deck, IMO.