Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't OD. LOL
Once she's convicted of first-degree murder, the trial moves to the aggravation phase. The prosecution must prove the existence of the aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. If the jury finds the state met its burden of proof in this phase, then we move on to the penalty phase, where they decide between LWOP or death. The additional witnesses are probably related to one or both of the aforementioned phases.
Who was supposed to go to Cancun with Travis? I assume the woman had to take off work, meet or drive with Travis to the airport, etc. Wouldn't she have freaked out and called Police or family when she didn't hear from him the morning of their trip? It seems so odd to me that he wasn't discovered for days.
Who was supposed to go to Cancun with Travis? I assume the woman had to take off work, meet or drive with Travis to the airport, etc. Wouldn't she have freaked out and called Police or family when she didn't hear from him the morning of their trip? It seems so odd to me that he wasn't discovered for days.
The show is a complete farce. Has there been a "jury" on that show that was in complete agreement? They only get 10 minutes to decide. All the prosecution had to say on that show was, "it only takes one minute to premeditate murder". The fact she waited hours to do it shows premeditation and cold calculation.
:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh: I just pretend my house is spic and span.
Sorry for the OT, it was discussed previously but I cant find where...
I was bored and looking through pictures and it just amazes me how "art" imitates life. Throughout her life, JA seems to have taken on the personality/thoughts/interests of whomever she was around indicating she had no sense of self. Nothing inside. Her drawings are the same, though I'd concede she has marginal talent (better than i could do even tracing) but from what I can see, again - nothing inside.
She didn't even attempt to change anything, however small, to make these drawings in any way 'her own'. Even the tiniest details are exact - hand placement, wrinkles in the clothing, shading, lighting, same...
I'd already seen these:
Natalie Portman Dior Ad
Pill drawing
Malboro Ad
and found these:
Frank Sinatra
Heart Hands
JA imitating Art that imitates the life she lived by imitating others. Creepy
Oh Jodi will hate her already, she's pretty.
Oh wow, Jill Hayes is a very beautiful lady.
But I just want this trial to end already. The prosecution's case is so strong, I don't see how any witness the DT can dig up can change that.
Oh Jodi will hate her already, she's pretty.
Is it wrong that I eat them with a toothpick? No orange fingers :skip:
Brittney Spears released a song titled "Womanizer" in 2008, so it's not close to being as old-fashioned/outdated as "courting"--another word we heard from time to time during the trial. Player is substituted for womanizer among some people in my age group. Neither word is anywhere near as derogatory as *advertiser censored*, which tends be the term used to describe women/young women who engage in similar behavior. Double standard.Aa9511,
I hope it's okay to comment on your post. What you just said is so real, so true. Do we even call males "womanizers" anymore? And what about young women who do the same thing? He was single! And men and women have been flirting and lying to one another since the beginning of time!
But remember Deanna's testimony? When she went on a missionary trip, Travis was considerate enough to write to her and tell her he wanted to date other women. I think Lisa D was the only one who thought he was seeing only her, and that was because he didn't want to lose her while he tried to break things off with Jodi, IMO. I also believe he and Jodi discussed this whole dating/sexual thing and she told him she was okay with it. She should have told him the truth and broken up with him. But this is Jodi we are talking about.
And you are correct, married men are the worst, which is very wrong. Again, Travis was single. I think the jury knows he was just normal.
Unless this "doctor" has extensive experience with individuals in the immediate aftermath of being shot in the same way Travis Alexander was, it's very unlikely his testimony will be relevant. JSS should not permit it---but will.I'm not sure if these are just rumours or what but according to the facebook page:
Dr. Geffner is a neuropsychologist and the def. want him to rebut Dr. Horn's testimony about the head wound. He will also rebut Dr. DeMarte's testimony about PTSD.
* There is a hearing Tues morning regarding a State motion [filed today]. I don't know if cameras will be rolling.