Linda7NJ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 32,068
- Reaction score
- 8,055
While watching the food channel! Roflmao!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MOO
If I were a juror, this would be my argument to others who couldn't get over the gunshot last theory:
It doesn't matter if the GSW was first or second. What exactly are you hung up on? The fact that she shot, stabbed and slashed his throat, or that she stabbed, slashed, and then shot him?
To me, the fact that she's saying he was lucid/concious during the second phase of her attack makes it look even worse, he suffered immensely.
If someone believes the gunshot first theory, it does not mean that Arias is automatically telling the truth, it just means that the order of the murder was not clear.
To me, the fact that she murdered him is NOT the question. What she used is NOT the question, the fact that she may or may not have BPD or PTSD is NOT the question, the fact that she has anxiety or derpression is NOT the question.
Gas Cans
Cell Phone Turned off
Rental Car
Pre-meditated alibi (that actually backfired)
Telling DB she was going to Mesa
Granpa's gun
Given the above premeditation outlined above, all of this other stuff is just about being "right" and not really about what matters.
I think DT wants to "smoke and mirror" everything to try and get some humanity for their defendant, and Martinez can't (and shouldn't) let it go. It was time (a long time ago) to reign in the DT, but in a Murder1, JSS is being cautious.
The cost for this defense is outrageous, and it seems like they have a blank check to do anything and everything that they want to do - irregardless of the quality of the experts or the value added to the defense. Where are the checks and balances here? Who authorized all of these wasteful tactics? In all of that, there wasn't a single ME to speak on her behalf.
I would be livid if I lived in Arizona. Murder1 or not, you should have to show prudence and responsible spending for your defense. Just think of the money they could have saved with ALV alone. Dr. Geffner..... $14,000 - and he was called last week????
AAARGH! My DH has some nerve! :maddening: The PITA wants me to pick him up from the airport this afternoon. Sheesh, he has two legs, why can't he just walk home? :giggle:
I know! The nerve! My daughter thinks I should pick her up from cheer practice too! Come on people. We only live 22 miles from the school! It will do you good. She so did not buy any of my arguments.
taxi! (j/k... well sort of) :giggle:
Yeah there's totally going to be an acquittal based on that typo. Forget premeditation and lying, that typo is going to be the defining moment.
Oh wait no. The typo is not the huge mistake some of you are making it. In the grand scheme of things a typo won't matter compared to gas cans, a gun shot, stab wounds, slitting of the throat, etc etc etc.
For you:
:bdscroll:
We share a birthday! Looking forward to Juan's closing, not so anxious to hear DT's.
I think that juror meant to ask something else and just worded it really badly and embarrassingly.
I made*first dress * quilts for my girls. You know,first Easter dress, first Christmas dress,etc* My poor boy got nothing,lol. Well he did just not a first dress quilt.
Basically you fry some eggs in salsa...I cook some bacon and warm some corn tortillas, some refried beans, hash browns etc...whatever you want with it.
Fresh fish later, caught enough for supper wade fishing yesterday
View attachment 33097
It was, but the DT is going to hammer away at it. I just don't like them FINALLY having something against a state's witness. And DH is about as important as they come. Also with the issue if he told DF the shot was first, might snowball.
I tried that or a limo! He didn't like that idea! :maddening: :snooty:
since when is an exageration not a lie. In my world it has always been a lie because exageration by its nature contains a measure of untruth.
Maybe that is why the mental health world is such a disaster.
I noticed that. Between furious erasing, hair sweeps and swirling her chair to eye the audience at her 'party' she makes a good case. That's why I think the jury will hold on to Dr D's assessment of BPD. People, jurors included aren't blind. They can see that something is very wrong even if they can't label it. Dr D explained in words that rang true, what they were seeing. None of the others described JA in the least.
how far is the airport? does he have walking shoes :lol:
j/k
He's responsible for his own lack of critical thinking though. He knew he was working in a vacumm but didn't care until his ego got bruised in public.
I nearly lost it when JW stormed up the aisle to Dr H asking if he knew how important this capital case was. Take a look in the mirror sister. :banghead: