When jodi was arrested, she rambled on for hours. One of the things she said was, I started dating Travis on Feb 2nd 2007. She went on to say shes picking that day for a reason. She did not tell Flores what the reason was. Linda, Travis' ex girlfriend said Travis was dating jodi in Oct 2006. I think I know why she picked Feb 2nd. That is the day of the month she slashed Travis tires. That was in 2008 though. Thats why IMO she picked that month and day.
I thought the defense spent way too long for way too little gain from that so called expert. Never met Jodi. Never conducted an autopsy. No thanks.
D@mn, TexMex those huevos look good. Morning everyone. Feeling good today, Juan's Closing Argument on my bday! :seeya:
I hope you don't mind but I posted this on the State Vs Arias site....I thought it was wonderful!
The guilty vote would be the right vote in my opinion, but they can also take all of this to vote not guilty. One of the questions, possibly the one I responded to, sounded sympathetic to Jodi and that's alarming to me at this point. Phrases like "publicly accused" and having her privacy "invaded" being used when coming to their own diagnosis sounds dangerous for a guilty verdict.
Sorry I'm new to court proceedings and I am trying plan my errands, who goes first today? Jaun or JW?
So much so that I could not post.
Got kicked off several times then came back right at the end..
so? Is today the beginning of the end for slasher?:rockon::jail:lease:
I never did believe in the death penalty...I think life would be good.That way she can get letters from people who are not happy with what she has done...
but whatever the jury decides will be what is it called when the convicted killer says the court or her counsel did not do their job?
She may try that for more time?
She will not give up so easily and will delay like they all do for punishment right?:banghead::seeya:
what is her prisoner number?
i'm so happy this is the first post i read this morning, because you are so RIGHT!!! i'm still stunned this judge allowed a psychologist to offer testimony to rebut the MEDICAL EXAMINER, who is a physician and a pathologist. just because this clown has studied the brain doesn't make him qualified to talk about GSW's to the head!! good LORD!
and even worse to me than the judge allowing him to do so is this guy getting up there and actually CLAIMING he knows anything about gunshot wounds. i just can't imagine an ethical, professional psychologist doing such a thing because in NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM was he qualified to do that!!!
this guy may come across well to some people on the stand. but the second he went into that----willingly-----and acting like he had expertise in the subject----i KNEW he was nothing more than another charlatan they found under a rock. probably the same rock alyce lives under.
it's pretty clear the DT couldn't find another ME or ANY physician to testify in rebuttal to dr. horn or we would have heard from them. this was lame, desperate, and this guy should be ashamed of himself and derided for this in FUTURE testimony for the remainder of his career.
I hope you don't mind but I posted this on the State Vs Arias site....I thought it was wonderful!
I hope you don't mind but I posted this on the State Vs Arias site....I thought it was wonderful!
I took that question as more of a semi-snarky winkwink, knudgeknudge since it is obvious to everyone that Jodi waived all rights to privacy during her 48Hrs and Inside Edition interview performances while waiting for her close-ups. It's not as if she was pulled out of Det Flores' overzealous bum with no proof she even knew Travis and then paraded before the public as the prime suspect.
Did HLN ever catch up?
They were still showing the doctor with the perfect dark hair and white moustache when I went to bed. TIA
Honestly, I would have tuned him out after he stated he never even read a police report or interviewed Jodi.
His sole job was to critique reports in a vacuum.
It was established, he was lied to and mislead by the defense team!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MOO) JA has no heart, no conscience, no remorse. She didnt just murder Travis, she savagely and brutally butcher him. It was a premeditated slaughter. Seems to me that JA has adopted very well to incarceration. With LWOP, she still gets to enjoy life - celebrity status, romantic relationships, her art, writing, etc. This case begs for the DP but if she gets LWOP, I wish we had the option of a prisoner exchange program where she would spend the rest of her life in a third-world prison.
No shame either when she snapped back at JM and said well the sex was good, or something to that effect and smiled. :facepalm: