so does this mean that the defense will finally have to get some work done? Actually fill in some of the blanks for the State?????:waitasec:
Well that was a big BOOYA to the defense. Love the part about how either the exculpatory evidence does not exist, or the defendant is intentionally violating the rules of discovery.
EDIT: Oh I see that's actually an older document, dated September of 2009.
And just because I can: to nit pick even deeper at the defense and their inability to provide satisfactory information for/at discovery: along with the difficulty with the addresses of the Kronk "witnesses" should have been the contact info for Henry Lee, Ph. D. at the Univesity of New Haven is 300 Boston Post Road. West Haven CT 06516, the address given is the
Forensic Science Laboratory, 278 Colony Street, MERIDEN CT 06451!
Ya gotta LOVE their ATTENTION TO DETAIL!!!!!! NOT!
Great motions. It is entirely reasonable for the State to make these requests at this time. Enough time has passed and the defense has stated in Court they have witnesses ready to testify and dispute State evidence. It's put up or shut up time.
Funny how the witnesses the defense claims are so ready to provide testimony favorable to KC are now shying away from being deposed by the State. They were not shy when they went on tv and provided sworn statements to the defense. Did these people honesly think the State would just accept their statements at face value?
I heart LDB - enough of this nonsense - let's get down to business!!!
How sad is it that a year and a half later, the SA is having to push the defense experts to complete their exams. And the defense wants us to take their claims of kc's innocence seriously? Please. I did enjoy the SA getting the chance to remind everyone that the so-called experts never finished their work and that the defense never could produce any evidence or witnesses they claimed would prove kc's innocence.
Check mate.
This motion really PO's me big time. It was filed today; the 2 PREVIOUS motions the SA filed are also attached for reference. Sept 2009 and December 2009.
This, to me, REALLY proves that the defense gameplan all along was to put off doing all the necessary work until we, the taxpayers, were paying for it.
Meanwhile, they blew all their money on meaningless BS interviews and depos of Kronks ex-wives, and jail employees that witnessed Casey's meltdown on Dec 11, 2008, and other things I don't recall at the moment.
As a taxpayer, I am INCENSED.
:furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious:
This motion really PO's me big time. It was filed today; the 2 PREVIOUS motions the SA filed are also attached for reference. Sept 2009 and December 2009.
This, to me, REALLY proves that the defense gameplan all along was to put off doing all the necessary work until we, the taxpayers, were paying for it.
Meanwhile, they blew all their money on meaningless BS interviews and depos of Kronks ex-wives, and jail employees that witnessed Casey's meltdown on Dec 11, 2008, and other things I don't recall at the moment.
As a taxpayer, I am INCENSED.
:furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious: :furious:
You are so right!! I, too, am VERY MAD! :furious::furious::furious::furious:
Well, I am not sure that this is going to go over well, but I will give it a shot. To my own horror, I find myself defending - up to a point- the defense. I know, I know, they have been idiots in a number of ways. However, having said that; their witnesses could not do their work or finish their work or even start their work until they KNEW what they were going to be working on. I will be the first to admit that I do not remember when the first scientific evidence started being released to the public. Let's take the autopsy report as an example. When was the final report released? Until that report was released the defense did not know EXACTLY what kind of experts they would need - aside from the obvious second opinion on the autopsy itself - until they knew what the report contained. Their plant specialist, trace evidence specialist, etc. Am I making myself understood enough here? Their experts could not get started until the State turned over evidence for them to examine and report on.
Do I think the defense delayed on purpose? Yes, I do, but we have to give their experts a little slack because their work only began when the State released the evidence and reports to them.
Well, I am not sure that this is going to go over well, but I will give it a shot. To my own horror, I find myself defending - up to a point- the defense. I know, I know, they have been idiots in a number of ways. However, having said that; their witnesses could not do their work or finish their work or even start their work until they KNEW what they were going to be working on. I will be the first to admit that I do not remember when the first scientific evidence started being released to the public. Let's take the autopsy report as an example. When was the final report released? Until that report was released the defense did not know EXACTLY what kind of experts they would need - aside from the obvious second opinion on the autopsy itself - until they knew what the report contained. Their plant specialist, trace evidence specialist, etc. Am I making myself understood enough here? Their experts could not get started until the State turned over evidence for them to examine and report on.
Do I think the defense delayed on purpose? Yes, I do, but we have to give their experts a little slack because their work only began when the State released the evidence and reports to them.
I would have thought the defense's job would have been easier actually. They have full access to casey. She knows what happened, just have to ask her. The State has to guess based on evidenceWell, I am not sure that this is going to go over well, but I will give it a shot. To my own horror, I find myself defending - up to a point- the defense. I know, I know, they have been idiots in a number of ways. However, having said that; their witnesses could not do their work or finish their work or even start their work until they KNEW what they were going to be working on. I will be the first to admit that I do not remember when the first scientific evidence started being released to the public. Let's take the autopsy report as an example. When was the final report released? Until that report was released the defense did not know EXACTLY what kind of experts they would need - aside from the obvious second opinion on the autopsy itself - until they knew what the report contained. Their plant specialist, trace evidence specialist, etc. Am I making myself understood enough here? Their experts could not get started until the State turned over evidence for them to examine and report on.
Do I think the defense delayed on purpose? Yes, I do, but we have to give their experts a little slack because their work only began when the State released the evidence and reports to them.