Missouri Mule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,490
- Reaction score
- 1,572
Why all these secretive posts in this thread too?
If you are going to allude to a source, it should be posted.
I've already explained why.
The problem is two fold. One is that we can't discuss actual people without fear of lawsuits and my pockets are not deep enough. Secondly, some ideas are met with derision because they are outside "acceptable thought" and I don't need the grief.
If people are that curious about these various web sites they can sit at their computer and do a Google or Bing and just read what is on the internet and draw their own conclusions. The one thing that we can be 100% certain is that someone, at some time, has come up with the right hypothesis. We just don't know which one. Each person will have to make up their own mind and should attempt if at all possible to research this subject and keep and open mind. There is far too much "group think" regarding this crime. Step over the "line" and expect to be pilloried. Who needs the aggravation? I have heard this time and again, even today, from some who are not mainstream in their thinking. My retort would be this. "Mainstream" thinking has gotten us nowhere up to this point.
If anyone wants to know how things could actually occur, suggest looking at the old Robert Redford movie "Three Days of the Condor." He works for the CIA as a researcher and he stumbles onto something he didn't even know meant anything. But it was sufficiently concerning to the powers that be that several people were murdered in cold blood to keep the truth from emerging. Some will say this is just a movie. Well, movies often mirror reality. And let us not forget Churchill's famous admonition,"Truth is so precious that she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies."