Was there ever a composite sketch done on TRM??
If this person was involved, there will hopefully be some evidence connecting him to the girls when everything found on the mountain is processed.
I've often wondered if TRM is the ultimate red herring--a skeevy guy who enjoyed taping the voices of young kids for unsavory purposes. Imagine the day he opened the paper to see that his likeness and proclivities had been linked to the sisters' disappearance from the mall--the last thing he'd want to do is come forward to the police and admit that he got his jollies taping the voices of children. What if the police suspected him of more? Even if he was innocent of abducting or harming the girls he'd likely never come forward (and never be seen tape recording children again).
TRM in Context 25 March 1975
I have mentioned many times that the Tape Recorder Man (TRM) could have been a number of different things that day.
Just taking that one incident in isolation, he could indeed have been a harmless old guy who was playing with a new tape recorder to see how it worked. It could have been pure coincidence that he, along with several thousand other folks were just enjoying a nice day at the mall.
However, when considering his presence and his actions in context, he becomes a potential suspect in the case. He was one of the last persons actually known to have been in contact with Sheila and Kate.
When they went missing, so did he. He walked away from them heading in the direction of Wards and was never seen again with his tape recorder.
Then consider the many other persons who came forward to describe the actions of a person they believed to be the same man on previous occasions - at Wheaton Plaza and in at least four other area shopping malls. In every case, a TRM was seen talking to and bothering young children and girls.
He was NOT doing a legitimate survey, but specifically targeting children.
Police stated that at least 15 persons had come forward with these reports in the first day after the TRM story came out in the news on 1 April 1975. All agreed that the composite was a good likeness to the man they saw and only a few offered slight changes to the origional drawing. Each was interviewed separately by police and each of these different witnesses tended to corroborate the statements of the others.
A person fitting TRM's description and actions with a tape recorder was seen at:
- White Oak shopping center near the entrance to Sears in February 1975 speaking to a red haired young teen girl holding a basketball.
- Wheaton Plaza in February 1975 trying to talk to two young toddlers in the presence of their mother.
- Again the next day at Wheaton Plaza trying to "interview" children.
- At Iverson Mall, at Marlow Heights Shopping Center, and at Bowie shopping center (all in Prince Georges County, MD) on Saturday, 22 March 1975 attempting to get young girls to read a telephone answering message into his tape recorder from a hand printed index card.
- And he was seen at Wheaton Plaza by three employees on Monday 24 March 1975 with his tape recorder the day before the Lyon girls went missing.
So, this guy, TRM (or his body double), was seen by a number of witnesses prior to being sighted by "Jimmy" and his friend at Wheaton Plaza on Tuesday 25 March 1975. He was very active before the disappearance, but never seen again (as TRM) IMMEDIATELY afterward.
I feel that his activities were far from "innocent" or "normal", and of a highly suspicious nature when considered in context. Certainly, if this guy were to have seen his likeness in the paper or on TV, he MIGHT have wanted to ditch his TRM persona, but he actually stopped being TRM a FULL WEEK before the news got the story. What caused him to drop the TRM act?
He had been in the area for at least a month before the girls went missing. Why did he NOT come forward to explain his actions and clear himself if he was not involved in their disappearance?
BBM If he was involved in the abductions, he stayed away for obvious reasons. Just a guess here...But, if he wasn't involved, maybe he learned of the kidnappings from the news stories and realized that he had aroused suspicion and perhaps would be suspected to be the abductor or at a minimum be connected to it somehow? By staying away, he could avoid having to go through the interviews, polygraphs, interrogations, etc. all the while hoping the girls would be found safe.
Has it ever been determined what he specifically said to the kids-especially the girls? Did he say anything inappropriate or suggest some of them meet him outside, at his car, etc? Just curious what he may or may not have said to them. I totally agree his activities were not normal or innocent and may very well somehow been involved in the girls' disappearance. MOO
TRM in Context 25 March 1975
I have mentioned many times that the Tape Recorder Man (TRM) could have been a number of different things that day.
Just taking that one incident in isolation, he could indeed have been a harmless old guy who was playing with a new tape recorder to see how it worked. It could have been pure coincidence that he, along with several thousand other folks were just enjoying a nice day at the mall.
Richard, at this point in time, what is the position of LE regarding TRM? Can't they just say one way or the other, if they think he has any involvement in this case? I don't think they have said anything about it in the time period that they named LLW a POI. So in a way, it makes me think they DO have an indication if he was involved or not, but they are just not saying. They also would have looked at any possible connection he may have had to the Welch clan. They MUST have asked LLW2 "Hey, did you see a guy with a tape recorder at Wheaton Plaza; do you know who the guy with the tape recorder was?" So, what DID Lloyd say to that question? Who knows, could he possibly have been the mystery second uncle that Dollie Estep referred to? Whoever he was, if he was just 40 years old at the time, he would be 80 now, and statistically likely to be dead. So perhaps LE would not name him if they knew who he was and he was deceased?
I think for sure TRM's behavior was strange, and the timing of his disappearance is suspect. He possibly could have been involved, but we're all just guessing in the dark. You've analyzed this case for years and probably know more about this case than anybody outside of LE, and also likely many things that are not public knowledge. The impression I get from your post is that you suspect TRM was somehow involved. If you were to ask LE point blank, does TRM have ANYTHING at all to do with the Lyon sisters case, what would they say? Would they give the standard LE response something to the effect that this is an on going investigation and we can't comment on this..., blah... blah...?
TRM in Context 25 March 1975
I have mentioned many times that the Tape Recorder Man (TRM) could have been a number of different things that day.
Just taking that one incident in isolation, he could indeed have been a harmless old guy who was playing with a new tape recorder to see how it worked. It could have been pure coincidence that he, along with several thousand other folks were just enjoying a nice day at the mall.Richard, at this point in time, what is the position of LE regarding TRM? Can't they just say one way or the other, if they think he has any involvement in this case? I don't think they have said anything about it in the time period that they named LLW a POI. So in a way, it makes me think they DO have an indication if he was involved or not, but they are just not saying. They also would have looked at any possible connection he may have had to the Welch clan. They MUST have asked LLW2 "Hey, did you see a guy with a tape recorder at Wheaton Plaza; do you know who the guy with the tape recorder was?" So, what DID Lloyd say to that question? Who knows, could he possibly have been the mystery second uncle that Dollie Estep referred to? Whoever he was, if he was just 40 years old at the time, he would be 80 now, and statistically likely to be dead. So perhaps LE would not name him if they knew who he was and he was deceased?
I think for sure TRM's behavior was strange, and the timing of his disappearance is suspect. He possibly could have been involved, but we're all just guessing in the dark. You've analyzed this case for years and probably know more about this case than anybody outside of LE, and also likely many things that are not public knowledge. The impression I get from your post is that you suspect TRM was somehow involved. If you were to ask LE point blank, does TRM have ANYTHING at all to do with the Lyon sisters case, what would they say? Would they give the standard LE response something to the effect that this is an on going investigation and we can't comment on this..., blah... blah...?
Over the past 40 years, there have been a number of different MCP case officers assigned to the Lyon case. Each probably has his or her own opinion of TRM. I have spoken with some of them in the past and I think that most were of the opinion that TRM might have been involved, but that since he was never identified, he could not be ruled in or out.
"Officially" as stated in early MCP press conferences, TRM was described and it was stated that they would like to talk to him, but that he was NOT considered a suspect. He never came forward and nobody was ever able to positively identify him.
MCP made a wide distribution of the TRM sketch and description throughout the month of April 1975. And when some slight changes were suggested by some of the other witnesses who had seen him earlier, they released the second version of the sketch. The changes were so slight, however, that they did not even change the serial number at the bottom of the picture.
One MCP case officer told me that at some point a man who lived in Prince Georges County, Maryland called them and claimed that he was the "TRM" seen at Iverson Mall, but he was adamant about never having done his tape recorder thing in Montgomery County. In fact, he had what MCP considered a pretty solid alibi for 25 March 1975 when he claimed to have been involved in an accident with a government vehicle that afternoon. According to the officer, this man asked that they not reveal his identity or let his family know about his activities - which he admitted were odd and inappropriate.
This "PG TRM" or "TRM number 2" could have been telling the truth, but I personally feel it unlikely and his "confession" suspicious. Why would he come forward with such a story? It is possible that he was by coincidence doing exactly the same thing as another person who looked just like him. But there could be other more likely explanations, such as he wanted to insert himself in the case with a false confession, knowing he had a good alibi. Or perhaps he was in some way involved with the girls' disappearance and was attempting to divert MCP attention away from Prince Georges County. All speculation, but still this TRM2 whether or not the story was true still did not explain anything about the TRM seen at Wheaton Plaza and White Oak Mall in Montgomery County.
I would point out that MCP spokesmen have never referred to TRM as a suspect after April 1975. However, all the news media agencies, like TV and newspapers still have those 1975 TRM sketches on file and they are part of many on-line case summaries, so they continue to be seen by the public. A good example of this is that when MCP and the FBI held their February 2014 press conference, they hinted to the press that they would be "re-releasing" a sketch made in 1975. Because of that announcement a few days before their conference, all the TV news stations had the TRM sketch on hand and showed it at various times during the press conference. It was not until the end of the conference that MCP and the FBI showed the sketch of a Long Haired Man (LHM) instead of the TRM sketch.
One MCP case officer told me that at some point a man who lived in Prince Georges County, Maryland called them and claimed that he was the "TRM" seen at Iverson Mall, but he was adamant about never having done his tape recorder thing in Montgomery County. In fact, he had what MCP considered a pretty solid alibi for 25 March 1975 when he claimed to have been involved in an accident with a government vehicle that afternoon. According to the officer, this man asked that they not reveal his identity or let his family know about his activities - which he admitted were odd and inappropriate.
This "PG TRM" or "TRM number 2" could have been telling the truth, but I personally feel it unlikely and his "confession" suspicious. Why would he come forward with such a story? It is possible that he was by coincidence doing exactly the same thing as another person who looked just like him. But there could be other more likely explanations, such as he wanted to insert himself in the case with a false confession, knowing he had a good alibi. .
I would hope that unless the alibi (crashing into a government car) was 100% rock-solid, the police took his photo and showed it to the half-dozen or so people who saw Montgomery County TRM. I would guess that that he did not look "just like" the Montgomery County TRM or none of the witnesses retained a good enough memory of Montgomery County TRM's face to identify him.
In 1975, seeing a man talking to kids with a tape recorder, might be different enough to be notable, it's not a certainty that people would stop to remember his face. It was an online post, obviously well after the police were looking for TRM, but one man claims to have remembered seeing Montgomery County TRM at White Oak, remembered seeing him someplace else, and told his girlfriend that he was a pervert or words to that effect (I think he used more derogatory terms).
I would also hope that in 1975 and in every cold-case re-investigation since then, the police checked PG Tape Recorder Man's criminal history and turned up nothing serious before or after 1975, or else they would have taken a second and/or third look at him.
Some people are just idiots, and some people lie all the time, but repeatedly saying I never used my tape recorder in Montgomery County, seems like a sure way to get convicted for murder, regardless if he committed the crime, if half-dozen or so people saw him in Montgomery County using his tape recorder with kids.
RichardLewis said:I would hope that unless the alibi (crashing into a government car) was 100% rock-solid, the police took his photo and showed it to the half-dozen or so people who saw Montgomery County TRM. I would guess that that he did not look "just like" the Montgomery County TRM or none of the witnesses retained a good enough memory of Montgomery County TRM's face to identify him.
In 1975, seeing a man talking to kids with a tape recorder, might be different enough to be notable, it's not a certainty that people would stop to remember his face. It was an online post, obviously well after the police were looking for TRM, but one man claims to have remembered seeing Montgomery County TRM at White Oak, remembered seeing him someplace else, and told his girlfriend that he was a pervert or words to that effect (I think he used more derogatory terms).
I would also hope that in 1975 and in every cold-case re-investigation since then, the police checked PG Tape Recorder Man's criminal history and turned up nothing serious before or after 1975, or else they would have taken a second and/or third look at him.
Some people are just idiots, and some people lie all the time, but repeatedly saying I never used my tape recorder in Montgomery County, seems like a sure way to get convicted for murder, regardless if he committed the crime, if half-dozen or so people saw him in Montgomery County using his tape recorder with kids.
Just to note, search for posts by Jeb if you're interested in reading the WS poster's input on his encounters with the man he believed to be TRM.