I'm sorry, but I am not 100% convinced that LE is not leaking this information through DY and KH. Or, at least, that they did so in the beginning. TY does seem more circumspect ("connect the dots") than KH and DY, though.
IF KH and DY are "going rogue," then it would bother me a lot if they are hampering the investigation out of a need to vent. But if they are not hurting the investigation, and LE has told them these things, I do not have a problem with them "outing" these people.
They have said they are going to pursue a civil remedy. They have that right. How angry they must be. Think Ron Goldman's family's anger with OJ Simpson. They do not have any responsibility to meet the same standard as LE does for a criminal case.
My biggest issues with the parents repeating what LE told them is now anything the parents say is assumed to be coming from LE even when the parents NEVER say that.
The parents statement on DeDe is very clear. They start out:
We have been briefed by law enforcement on the most recent developments in Kyron's case.
"Briefed" says that they were not giving details. However, by leading out with this sentences, many are assuming the rest of the statement is based on what LE told them about DeDe. However, the parents are very careful to state that their information is other than LE.
We have been informed that they have identified a person that has been in close communication with Terri Moulton Horman since Kyron went missing and her name is DeDe Spicher. She has not only been in close communication with Terri but has been providing Terri with support and advice that is not in the best interests of our son.
Their statement NEVER states who informed them about DeDe. If LE told them, why does it not say LE has identified? IMO, because the most important part to them of how DeDe is not cooperating did not come from LE.
Usually with a statement, the most important part is at the beginning. To the parents, the issue they talk about first it not DeDe and LE. But DeDe is in "close communication" "providing support and advice" to Terri. Sounds like DeDe is being Terri's friends. The parents feel that DeDe being a friend to Terri is not in the "best interest" of their son.
Additional information provided shows that she is refusing to cooperate with law enforcement, she is also going as far as to suggest to others that may have information regarding Kyron's disappearance, not to cooperate as well.
http://www.kgw.com/news/local/Kyron...f-Terris-to-tell-what-she-knows-99076714.html
Again, their statement does not say how they know that DeDe is refusing to cooperate with LE. It also does not state how they know she is "suggesting" to others "not to cooperate." Nor does it state what those "suggestions" are regarding "cooperation." Most importantly, it does not state that LE is saying DeDe is refusing to cooperate with them.
It is interesting though that the only friend of Terri's that is publically named is DeDe. The two other "friends" are not publically named. What do we know about the other two "friends?"
Both said they feel theyve been dragged into the investigation by simply being supportive of Terri and doing things like visiting her at her home.
But both said they are stepping away from the situation as much as they can because its simply not something they want to be connected with anymore.
http://www.katu.com/news/local/99146044.html
IMO, the only difference between DeDe who was publically outed and the other "friends" is that DeDe has refused to stop being Terri's friend.
I just cannot support the "outing" of anyone to be vilified in the public just because they are being a good friend.
IMO, we do not know if anything in this statement was told to the parents by LE. All we do know is that LE "briefed" them and someone else informed them about DeDe.
IMO, that is the biggest problem with the parents repeating what LE tells them. Now any statement the parents make is assumed to be coming from LE even when the parents state otherwise.