1,2, and 3 are evidence of a hardened criminal who is interested in the criminality of what he has done. Doing it while the parents are there, using a weapon, and terrorizing the parents.
- The killer developed a weapon to facilitate control and kill on a child.
- The killer made repeated threats of extreme violence directed at a child, when only one small innuendo would have been enough.
- The killer brought cord with him, and carried out a planned assault and murder on a child in the same house where the parents slept.
- The killer demanded a ransom amount that makes sense to nobody. Not PR, JR, or anybody whom they know.
- The killer had no fear leaving 2 1/2 pages of handwriting.
- The killer escaped the law.
- The killer didn't like the U.S.
- The killer didn't like 'fat cats'.
- The killer worked in a group, as many in organized crime do.
- The killer remembered and used lines from violent films.
- The killer used the terms Victory and SBTC even though they didn't relate to kidnapping.
- The killer's composition was better than his handwriting or spelling.
5,6, and 7 actually work together also. If the killer is foreign, then no fear leaving handwriting, no problem escaping the law for 10 years, and looks at the US from the POV of an outsider.
4 and 8 are related. If JR's bonus was really 118,000, the perp may think that qualifies JR as a fat cat.
Its clear to see (pretty obvious) that the RN is more complicated than an on the spot improvisation could or would be. But only to those willing to look.
Don't quit your day job. I can't even think of another reply to your ridiculous post. It is absolutely ridiculous that you are even considering this note at face value. You are going to have to step up the intelligence level here or the communication is going to seriously curtail. I don't care how self-righteous that sounds. Your reasoning is beyond juvenile. Comeon put some effort into it and at least try and think about it.