M
Scandigirl,
When the TV companies decide to run a Ramsey documentary or any other crime themed series, they want a gripping, dramatic narrative, something to sell ads against.
So the participating detectives have to come up with the theories and I reckon they mostly fit the evidence to their theories, not always, but most of the time.
So in the CBS case we have Spitz and Kolar contributing aspects of their respective theories, so to pad out the narrative, i.e. JonBenet steals a piece of pineapple. Instead of theorizing did JonBenet have her own bowl of pineapple, which she ate, then wanted to go upstairs?
JonBenet could have been situated at four crime scenes the night she was killed, i.e. BR's bedroom, her own bedroom, the kitchen, and the basement.
So it could all have taken place in BR's bedroom, then he moved her to her own bedroom, did some minimal staging. Think about this everyone, could BR have done enough staging so that his parents were never sure what took place?
JonBenet was moved down to the kitchen area, this is possibly the interlude between the head blow and the asphyxiation, the pillow might have been used to comfort JonBenet, then she was moved down to the basement where the final staging took place.
If BR is going to intentionally assault JonBenet it will not be in a semi-public area like the breakfast bar. It will be in a location he has confidence in, i.e. his own bedroom, a location JonBenet willingly visits at night.
.
Thanks for everyone's very interesting responses and ideas! All we can really do at this stage is speculate the most likely theories based on what we can know, as Heymom has said. If we ever do get to find out much more of the details any time in the fufure, it will be fascinating to see how many things we got right- or not!
UK Guy, your post above is very interesting. It seems logical to break it down into 4 distinct crime scene areas, and also distinct stages in both the attack/killing and the staging. It would be surprising (at least to me), if Burke actually did most things involved, beyond the initial head blow, and left a scene where it was very difficult for his parents to even know what happened, or to be able to even disguise it very effectively.
This makes me think of one of Patsy's interviews (sorry this is very vague), where she is being questioned about Burke possibly being responsible. She first of all said, in so many words, that it couldn't be her child who would do it. When pressed further, and asked if it could even have been an accident, she hesitated and said: "I... I don't know", or words to that effect, indicating for a moment that she really might not have been sure what happened, either way. Does anyone know which interview this was?
I wonder if Patsy did a lot of the staging down in the basement (that's assuming there was all that much staging to do), because she was probably the first one out of her and John to discover the scene? She was most likely the one who was still fully dressed and up and about, finishing packing?
UK Guy, your thoughts that Burke would be more likely to assault JB in a private space like a bedroom makes sense. If he was openly and innocently eating pineapple, even with JB, downstairs in the kitchen, in a normal way, before the head bash happened, then why would he be sneaking around with a flashlight, and not simply switching the main kitchen light on? Unless he was scared of being told off for being up in the night, or something? I think the neighbours said they saw "strange, moving lights" in the kitchen, but not the main lights on at any point?
I still can't see Burke being able to move JB down any flights of stairs, though, even from a bedroom to the kitchen, if she was already knocked out at that point?
Finally, my apologies to ask a question again, about the GJ indictment... I was listening to another one of Jim Clemente's podcasts (about another case, as it happens), and he was explaining what normally constitutes a charge of Murder in the First Degree. He said that usually means premeditation and some level of pre planning, and/or excessive violence. Is that what the GJ think happened with Burke (ie very much not simply an accident)? I'm still confused on this, so any explanation would be really helpful!
My confusion partly stems from trying to understand what many of the various experts really think, as like you say, they may have played it safe or only inserted parts of their theories on the CBS show, or they may disagree amongst each other. Perhaps, again, it's all too many details, and the main thing is to simply know who was responsible over all, in broad terms.