Minette
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 4
Minor was 17.
But she was 16 when she first started sexting with this 'stud.'
Minor was 17.
I hope I'm crazy, but what I read is that SHE can get in trouble for distributing child *advertiser censored* - a picture of herself.
I'm from GA and totally agree with you, but sadly we're part of the majority of states in this country with this issue. I believe there are around 39 states that the age of consent is under 18 (the federal age of whether or not something is child *advertiser censored*). So while I agree with your outrage, it's not just us!
Edited because as usual I misspelled something.
Probably, it just makes no sense. He didn't need to say anything, LE had him pegged from the first minute.sure seemed to me mom referred to LE as them.
"Well, did you tell them too much?"
Sorta does sound like a smartass remark if she is standing by her man and still loves him.
Who even knows who "them" is.
Wasn't he talking about getting fired from Home Depot because he'd be charged with a felony?
I am not so sure he wasn't talking about the underage girl here.
Or that he interviewed at Cbic fila .
I think they both thought he would be let go for "forgetting" cause there was no malice.
I have no idea what she meant.
moo
My quotes just meant she said it not me, but you are correct, I had the wording wrong.You have that in quotes ginger, and it's a little different than what I've seen, I think. Do you have link for "Well, did you tell them too much?"
My quotes just meant she said it not me, but you are correct, I had the wording wrong.
And she looks at him, and she's like, 'Well, did you say too much?' " the detective testified.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/07/justice/georgia-hot-car-toddler-death/index.html?c=&page=4
My point is the same, exactly who was she referring to.
Probably LE, maybe HD?
I will look at the full transcript again later.
I didn't mean to misquote - sorry.
moo
I was just clarifying.Oh gosh, no need to apologize. I wasn't trying to call you on it. Just asking in case I missed something and pointing it out in case I didn't. In this very thread, I wasn't clear that someone had to die for there to be a murder charge of any kind, and someone corrected me on it lest someone conclude based on my statements you can be guilty of murder even if no one is dead. lol
I don't think we can tell the "who" of it until we see the video or a transcript of the actual interview. No need to look for it. Just trying to keep the actual quotes straight.
I'm sorry, do you disagree that we should accurately quote? If so, by all means, please just come right out and say so! lol
I am familiar with kik because my oldest daughter and all of her friends use it. Well...did use it. I have taken it away because random strangers messaged her sexual talk several times. In my experience thats what kik is all about. Guys messaged her saying things like I'm horny etc.
Since the hearing I have seen posts which indicate things like maybe it was not really a minor but someone posing as one.
I wanted to start this thread for discussion about the minor and how she factors in, possibly to the searches about statutes regarding age of consent and maybe even those pertaining to how to survive prison.
I did not catch this at the time of the hearing because I was reeling with the revelations. Stoddard has met and interviewed the 17 year old. and Has also tracked down and interviewed another female sexting partner who is above the age of consent.
Which is why they are looking at charging him for internet crime of trading pornographic images via the web with her. It was also mentioned in the hearing that there may be charges leveled regarding his having actually physically met the minor.